Close Menu
    Politics

    FBI hat Berichten zufolge Trumps Namen in Epstein -Dateien aufgrund von Datenschutzschutz reduziert

    Share.
    View 43 Comments

    43 Kommentare

    2. Face2FaceRecs on

      Privacy protections for sex traffickers and pedophiles? Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense.

    5. Be-skeptical on

      Privately they want to protect Trump from undeniable proof that he raped children

    7. R_Lennox on

      The game is rigged. Inside and out. They care about Trump, not the victims. How does MAGA justify any of this?

    8. JimmyRamone17_ on

      „Privacy protections“, call it a fucking cover up, media cowards.

    11. papayonpeluo on

      Here it is! The cover-up in plain sight:

      The employees spotted several references to Trump, as well as dozens of other public figures. However, as officials prepared to release the files, a unit applied redactions in accordance with nine FOIA exemptions, one of them being „a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.“ And since Trump was a private citizen when the Epstein investigation began in 2006, his name was redacted

      Officials said the files had unverified hearsay about many people who had socialized with Epstein in the past, including Trump. They added that they were not planning on releasing additional files because they contained child pornography and victims‘ personal information.

    14. ranchoparksteve on

      By the way, all those black marks you see there are concealing Donald Trump, for his privacy.

    15. everyvotecounts_2024 on

      Coverup to the max – but we all already know he’s in the files. He’s the star of the whole thing – biggest child rapist of them all

    16. BradlyPitts89 on

      Honestly, when you look at Trump’s legal history, the things he’s said on record, and all the footage of him with Epstein, it’s clear the guy has something to hide. It’s wild that he’s still a major political figure after being found liable for sexual abuse and making all those disgusting public comments. This is what happens in a plutocracy—when someone like Trump is installed, it’s not just about him. It’s a signal that the ultra-wealthy and connected can get away with anything. If he walks, the people who put him there get to breathe easier too.

    17. Objective_Bar_5420 on

      And yet whatever is in there was STILL so bad he can’t release the files.

    18. KCGeezer on

      Still think the financials will tell a much fuller story. I wonder just how integrated mar a largo was to the whole Epstein pedo ring.

    19. dr_z0idberg_md on

      I bet you the names of any Democrats in there would be highlighted, underlined, and enlarged to 36 size font.

    20. PatchyWhiskers on

      If it ever gets released, we can assume every blanked out name is Trump then?

    21. aradraugfea on

      “To protect the president’s privacy, we have removed his name from the files.”

      “To protect Hunter Biden’s privacy, here is a picture of his penis. Once again, that is Hunter Biden. Son of 46th President Joe Biden.”

    23. dave_your_wife on

      Just more proof America is a shithole! Covering up for fucking pedos! What next? Child porn live streams from the whitehouse?

    24. RamonaQ-JunieB on

      You redact the victims NOT the perpetrators but the FBI already knew that.

    26. Endosymbionical on

      Reminder :; , . Donald Trump is not merely a client, ., . but he is very likely to be one of the main players in the Trumpstein files, ,. .. ,

    27. TintedApostle on

      Meanwhile they let ICE and Palantir have your personal and medical information.

    30. ziltchy on

      The president should have no privacy. They are are representative of the people. Everything in their life should be exposed to the public

    32. SendMeIttyBitties on

      HE’S A CHILD FUCKER. The president doesn’t get privacy protections in situations like this.

      ***THE MOST CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION EVER. FUCKING MICKEY MOUSE OPERATION***.

    34. Throwme2Dwolves on

      Can someone explain why privacy for someone implicated in a federal crime needs redaction?

    36. legomaximumfigure on

      Donald Trump is the MOST public figure in history. His job is to literally represent all US citizens. Why don’t you just release the files with everyone else’s name but him redacted and let the public see what the context of his name used in the files.

    37. habbadee on

      Trump is a Madoff-Epstein-Hitler Frankenstein hybrid. And he has somehow taken over the dominant political party of the world’s superpower and dominant economy. You couldn’t write a movie script so ridiculous, yet here we are.

    39. OrangeSlicer on

      Why fuck kids? Where are they getting these kids? How the fuck is this the timeline?

    41. BallBearingBill on

      So there are files? I thought Bondi said there’s nothing to see here? This administration is a joke!

    43. Plumshart on

      What about these so-called “privacy protections” for those who aren’t redacted? By this logic, shouldn’t the whole list be redacted?

      They aren’t even trying to do a convincing lie at this point.

    Leave A Reply