Can’t believe the machines conspired to put more rural votes per machine just to make it *look* like Trump was more popular. /s
HannasAnarion on
A few weeks ago I finally read the ETA analysis and realized it was so bad, and so many people were sharing it as definitive, I couldn’t let it go. So I made this set of interactive visualizations, simulations, and games to ELI5 why they are wrong.
2 Kommentare
Can’t believe the machines conspired to put more rural votes per machine just to make it *look* like Trump was more popular. /s
A few weeks ago I finally read the ETA analysis and realized it was so bad, and so many people were sharing it as definitive, I couldn’t let it go. So I made this set of interactive visualizations, simulations, and games to ELI5 why they are wrong.
Tools:
Data analysis done in Python.
Visualizations made with [Observable Plot](https://observablehq.com/plot/).
Source: [Clark County Nevada Official Cast Vote Records](https://www.clarkcountynv.gov/government/departments/elections/reports_data_maps/)
Code: [https://github.com/Trevortds/clark-county-election-analysis](https://github.com/Trevortds/clark-county-election-analysis)
(new submission comment because an edit to the original one might have hit a filter, let me know if you’re now seeing duplicate)