Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Threads Wir Abrams haben sich von einem IED ausgeschlagen (ausgingen). Ramadi, Irak 2006. Von Strict_Key3318
rising_then_falling on 19.07.2025 10:43 p.m. Turret stayed on, disappointing. Maybe I’ve been on this sub too long…
HatchingCougar on 19.07.2025 10:45 p.m. And the Russian’s be like: ‘after all that and it still kept its turret?? What sorcery is this?!?!’
Ahmed-Rm on 19.07.2025 10:47 p.m. Non-aerodynamic turret, what distinguishes it from the Russian ones.
Soap_Mctavish101 on 19.07.2025 10:52 p.m. And despite all that the crew is probably fine if a bit shook.
swampking6 on 19.07.2025 10:52 p.m. What’s with the influx of old afgan/iraq content? We gearing up for part 4? That would suck
geckothesteve on 19.07.2025 10:59 p.m. Seeing the blow out panels work is pretty interesting. Did the crew survive?
SuieiSuiei on 19.07.2025 11:02 p.m. Dose anyone know the lore and stuff behind this? I’ve heard that very very few abrams got taken out completely by enemies in the middle east.
airborneisdead on 19.07.2025 11:22 p.m. The Americans have been building tanks with survivability in mind since WW2, the crew was probably alright.
9 Kommentare
Turret stayed on, disappointing. Maybe I’ve been on this sub too long…
And the Russian’s be like:
‘after all that and it still kept its turret?? What sorcery is this?!?!’
Does this hurt the baberams
Non-aerodynamic turret, what distinguishes it from the Russian ones.
And despite all that the crew is probably fine if a bit shook.
What’s with the influx of old afgan/iraq content? We gearing up for part 4? That would suck
Seeing the blow out panels work is pretty interesting. Did the crew survive?
Dose anyone know the lore and stuff behind this? I’ve heard that very very few abrams got taken out completely by enemies in the middle east.
The Americans have been building tanks with survivability in mind since WW2, the crew was probably alright.