Die Leute erwähnten die GPU -Leistung im Vergleich zum Preis, also siehe aktualisierter Post.
Die Leistung basiert auf der durchschnittlichen Benchmark -Leistung von GPUs von UserBenchmarks.
Von Large_Cantaloupe8905
Die Leute erwähnten die GPU -Leistung im Vergleich zum Preis, also siehe aktualisierter Post.
Die Leistung basiert auf der durchschnittlichen Benchmark -Leistung von GPUs von UserBenchmarks.
Von Large_Cantaloupe8905
7 Kommentare
Price is MSRP price at release.
This makes no fucking sense. Why would you compare 2060 to 5090? Price to performance of each card in the same generation compared to flagship of the same generation would make a lot of sense.
I had to stop and scratch my head for a bit and am still not sure what 180% price vs performance means.
I would assume it is some performance/price? But is the performance metric zero based? Also why are the dots connected? There isn’t anything between an 80 and an 80-Ti. A color coded scatter plot seems more accurate.
>Performance is based on average benchmark performance by GPUs **from Userbenchmarks**
You realize data from Userbenchmark is completely worthless right? That isn’t a valid source for performance data.
Is this ignoring the 4070TS which has a particularly-good price/perf?
MSRP at price of release without adjustment for inflation is not an apples-to-apples comparison
Where is the exact calculation for performance vs price? Think you need to go back to drawing board on this as this really does not make any sense.