Share.

    30 Kommentare

    1. I_Hate_Consulting on

      „Democratic lawmakers have proposed a bill that would force federal immigration agents to wear visible identification during public enforcement operations.“

      Yep. For sure that’ll make it through congress.

    2. Rude-Strawberry-6360 on

      DOA.  Won’t even make it to the Senate let alone out of the committee.

    3. Won’t pass and even if it did they wouldn’t comply and they’d face no consequences.

    4. Hopefully states enact this requirement if the congress fails. We have to do something as the current anonymous law enforcement isn’t OK.

    5. Ancient_Popcorn on

      Even if it left Committee, it would die in the House. Even if it passed the House, it would die in the Senate. Even if it passed the Senate, it would die by veto under Trump. Even if it wasn’t vetoed, it wouldn’t be enforced. Even if it was enforced, SCOTUS would rule it unconstitutional. Even if it was ruled constitutional, the agents wouldn’t obey.

      This bill is dead all the way from the start to the end.

    6. faith_apnea on

      „forced“ – it is fucking ludicrous that federal agents are not required to identify themselves. This is not a game.

    7. severedbrain on

      Call you congress-critters! Yes, even the republicans, especially the republicans. Call them every day. Make it clear that the police are accountable to us. If they’re going to demand proof we’re citizens they can answer first!

    8. This is not going to pass. Somehow if it does they are going to complain that it makes them feel unsafe.

    9. Dramatic_Original_55 on

      Obscuring your identity while committing a crime is, in itself, already a crime. Kidnapping, which is what they are doing, is already a crime. We don’t need new laws, we need to enforce the ones that already exist.

    10. bluecollarclassicist on

      This is going to be a huge problem for them when they start getting identified as violent felons, insurrectionists, and all other forms of ineligible for federal employment or firearms.

    11. basketballsteven on

      Sure make a law cause Trump and his administration respects the laws.

    12. RegisterOk2927 on

      Some NYPD tape over their badges during protests all the time. They always find a way…

    13. DynamicDolo on

      Clickbait works in all sorts of directions. The title misleads the actual article, as they normally do when something positive comes up. The title is past tense, when in reality, this will not likely happen even tho everybody wants it.

      Show your joy for it now, because you’re not getting it. It’s a social relief valve for the ones in power to do this shit.

    14. PrincessImpeachment on

      You just know that republicans would say something stupid like, „It’s too costly to have to create name badges for every agent“ as a scapegoat to immediately kill this bill.

    15. PaperbackBuddha on

      A bill that would require law enforcement to identify themselves as such when they’re seizing people off the streets? So the public knows there some kind of due process potentially at work rather than some random abduction by masked vigilantes?

      Yeah, sure, I like the idea. Not gonna happen, but it’s up there with Miranda rights as a concept, which in turn is probably slated for phase-out soon.

    16. Rambos_Magnum_Dong on

      No they’re not. It’s a proposed bill that will have little chance of NOT getting vetoed.

    17. 0% this passes. Neither chamber would pass it, and even if they did, Trump would veto it.

    18. Even if by some miracle this passed, it would not have a veto-proof majority.

    19. futanari_kaisa on

      I estimate the chance that this bill passes and Trump signs it into law is about .00000000000000003%

    20. More like „ICE may possible need to ignore a newly proposed bill that would try to force them to wear visible ID.“

    21. Grand_elf_the_white on

      Most people have a visible ID on top of their neck. I think some are calling it a face.

    Leave A Reply