Share.

    42 Kommentare

    1. Prior_Coyote_4376 on

      All these headlines are being so delicate with their language. “Shortsighted” lol

      It’s “fucking stupid”.

    2. ShingujiArataka on

      Is it, though? If your goal is to create a dull, incurious populace, as the current administration is, then this seems like a big win for them as it’ll impact things for at least a generation

    3. Unlucky-Public-2947 on

      Its (relatively speaking) such a tiny amount of money that it cant really be for any other reason that to prevent Americans from watching non commercialised content that they are unable to control.

    4. Cool-Presentation538 on

      Shortsighted can describe any trump policy, it’s shortsighted, reactionary bullshit all the way down

    5. But they sure have had tunnel vision for eliminating PBS for a long time.

      Guys, right wingers, specifically the heritage foundation project 2025 types, think concepts like “neutral education” are indoctrination against them and their “reason for existence”.

      You got to watch a PragerU or Answers in Genesis video to hear about it though because it goes through a lot of money and sane washing before it gets to the general public.

    6. OhioValleyCat on

      It’s sad what America’s politics has been reduced to a situation where a President, his administration, and a larger cross-section of his political party denounce any information they don’t like as being „woke.“ Being „woke“ is essentially being socially conscious and caring about what happens in society and tempering injustice. Trump’s MAGA movement is about embitterment, hostility, and division. The federal government is supposed to promote the general welfare of society, not fan the flames of hate. The sad part is that all these efforts at fanning the flame of hate may be a misdirection to allow Trump to fill his coffers through corruption and kleptocracy.

    7. Rev_Henry_Cane on

      Ken Burns, Fred Rodgers, and LeVar Burton have all fought to keep PBS well funded.

      In my books, if you’re on the opposite side of those 3 on this, you’re on the wrong side.

    8. InternationalBug7568 on

      Sort term gain for long term PAIN…. this is a deliberate deconstruction…. yes. and destruction of democracy…as ‚they‘ will replace it with’their‘ goals of control… 1984…BladeRunner

    9. ExcellentWinner7542 on

      I don’t want the government funding any broadcasting company. This should become law that prevents this funding and funding to any social media outlet.

    10. AGuyWhoBrokeBad on

      If there are two things trump is know for it’s delicate forethought and detail oriented planning.

    11. SnooStrawberries3391 on

      These folks trying to kill PBS are the type of people who wouldn’t understand what Sesame Street is or does, never mind the rest of the excellent programing.

      MAGA seems to favor things like WWE Fantasy Wrestling, Jackass and Duck Dynasty every time.

      Who wants NOVA, Nature or Masterpiece Theater type programing, when you can mindlessly watch quality Fox Entertainment “news” 24/7.

      The felon Presidunce trump is right there with them.

    12. They are just cruel and rapacious grifters. They’re sociopaths.

      PS: OMG Ken finally got an adult haircut.

    13. Andovars_Ghost on

      Republicans are so shortsighted, they can only see backwards. Specifically, backwards in time to the grand ol’ 50’s. 1850s…

    14. RamonaQ-JunieB on

      MAGATS don’t care for PBS because it has programs that uses big words that they don’t understand and they feel like stupid. I guess if the shoe fits???

    15. AlanShore60607 on

      It’s not shortsighted.

      It’s a long-term strategy that we disagree with because it will hurt the country by changing power dynamics of the nation

    16. Cities will keep supporting PBS. Rural areas, not so much. They’ll have to watch city shows.

    17. >The funding cuts are „shortsighted,“ Burns said, because „it mainly serves rural areas in which the PBS signal may be the only signal they get.“

      >Burns stressed that PBS has children’s programming, continuing education, information on homeland security, crop reports and weather emergencies, saying, „that, we’re going to take away?“

      >“I just think that maybe we’re throwing the baby out with the bath water,“ Burns said.

    18. NoExcuses1984 on

      Is anyone else here underwhelmed by Ken Burns‘ upcoming *The American Revolution* after it’s already been done in astounding fashion with A&E’s *The American Revolution* in the ’90s and History’s *The Revolution* in the early-2000s?

      I’ll wait until *Henry David Thoreau* drops in 2026, thanks.

      To add, once-tremendous, since-slipped programs, like *American Experience* and *Secrets of the Dead*, have declined greatly in quality lately. PBS must up its game, but alas.

    19. SnooLobsters6766 on

      Public television deserves funding because it’s non-partisan. The mouth breathers don’t know that because they don’t watch I guess.. On a side note PBS must spend an hour of pre-show fundraising for every hour of Ken Burns documentaries it shows. He’s their bread and butter.

    20. Just listened to an “On the Media” podcast where Brooke Gladstone makes the same argument in a discussion with the Heritage Foundation author of the Project 2025 chapter about public broadcasting. She makes the same mistake that Ken Burns makes here, which all journalists seem to make – they think MAGA cares about people and the country. MAGA doesn’t care about anything except power. If you see this through that lens defunding NPR and any publicly funded media makes 100% sense. This cements the lock conservative propaganda outlets will have on rural voters. It makes it seem natural that “news” should be partisan and commercial. It emphasizes the point that government won’t help you (see the flooding in Texas, the lack of warnings, and the finger pointing happening in real time.)

      Treating MAGA as “serious” or interested in policy or people plays into their hands. They can and will say anything to get power. Taking them seriously makes them seem serious. Hit back on all the bad they are voting for and all the BS they and Trump spout.

    21. NOGOODGASHOLE on

      If you’re dumb you believe anything and vote that way. These people understand what their constituents (a word their voters cant spell) being uneducated, is a sure path to victory.

    22. I love Ken Burns docs. I actually have a DVD copy of his WW2 doc, about two inches to the left of my keyboard as I type. If any of you have never seen any, go and find the National Parks one. It is almost as good as being in the parks. He also did a short doc on the Dust Bowl that is much shorter than his standard productions, but just as engaging. The West is another of my favorites.

    23. Burns when he did the Civil war, picked the wrong winners of the war, therefore the funding cuts.

    24. > Then in June, the House approved a request from the White House to claw back $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The package is expected to be taken up by the Senate in the coming weeks as the White House has targeted the public media entities, claiming they have „spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as ’news.'“

      Is this the separate rescission bill that will codify cuts to USAID and other agencies as well, one that can be passed through the Senate needing only 50+ votes?

    25. Can’t afford to dehumanize immigrants, play golf and support public broadcasting.

    Leave A Reply