Trumps Unterzeichnung von ‚One Big Beautiful Bill‘ beinhaltet 85 Millionen US -Dollar, um die Entdeckung von Space Shuttle von Smithsonian nach Texas zu bewegen

    https://www.space.com/space-exploration/space-shuttle/trumps-signing-of-one-big-beautiful-bill-includes-usd85-million-to-move-space-shuttle-discovery-from-smithsonian-to-texas

    Share.

    48 Kommentare

    1. I look forward to the next Administration spending $100 million to move it back to the Smithsonian, where it belongs.

    2. Then_Journalist_317 on

      The bill contains zero dollars for combatting climate change that resulted in Texas flash flooding, killing dozens.

    3. Not being reported on Fox News… It’s fake new to 70+ million… 🤦‍♂️

    4. travisreavesbutt on

      Glad they cut the $10mil set aside to research the kind of brain cancer I have.

    5. Bubbly_Complex843 on

      Fuck you! Actually it’s fuck me and the rest of the citizens. Spending billions on bullshit and undoing the social net!

    6. >Trump’s signing of ‚One Big Beautiful Bill‘ includes $85 million to move space shuttle Discovery from Smithsonian to Texas

      That coming from the party that sheds crocodile tears three times a day about „the sanctity of life of children“!

      $85 million could have fed thousands of poor children who would go hungry because of Trump’s One Big Ugly Bill

      But, hey, at least millionaires and billionaires will have more money that they didn’t need!

    7. Crazy_Ad_7302 on

      They shouldn’t move the shuttles again. However, given these idiots are hell bent on Houston getting a shuttle they should move enterprise instead. The Smithsonian is a million times better choice than NYC.

    8. This is at least depressingly in line with history. Consider that the whole thing of “spacecraft are under Florida control until they clear the tower, then it switches to Houston“ came about because Lyndon Baines Johnson got Houston space center as his fee for getting funding for the moon landing through Congress.

    9. Museum professional here, telling you not to worry quite yet. I have worked at the Smithsonian Institution among other notable museums in the US and have lots of experience including a Master’s degree.

      First of all, the Smithsonian owns the shuttle now, not NASA. There aren’t any mechanisms by which to strip their ownership. Sure, someone could buy it, but who has the money? And somewhere to put it?

      Any reputable museum would not let any piece out of their collection that could be in any danger – why would you sell a rare painting to someone you know will put an axe through it immediately. Ethics is a HUGE issue in the museum world; everyone in my graduate programme had to take a legal ethics course. There are also standards to be an accredited museum (under a group called the AAM); violations of their rules can get your museum decertified.

      Secondly, there is no way currently to transport the shuttle to Texas. The dedicated 747 was long ago scuttled. An entire new one would have to be built, which I imagine will take most of the money set aside and take a long time to do safely. Roads and bridges cannot tolerate the weight of the shuttle on a transport (like a tractor trailer).

      Do I think it’s still a possibility? Yes, of course, but I don’t think it’s likely. Obvs this is all a very complicated situation with a lot of legal minutia. It’s nothing more than (yet another) stupid ass vanity problem created out of thin air to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.

      Glad to answer questions!

    10. DramaticCattleDog on

      How many kids could that feed or how many homeless people could that help off of the streets?

    11. Money well spent as per usual. Fuck those kids who need food assistance, lets spend on shit that matters…like moving a retired space shuttle.

    12. The Shuttle will not get moved. $85,000,000.00 will be pocketed by Texas politicians. That is the plan here.

    13. If JSC was going to get one it should have happened when they moved them all originally. To do this shit and take the one in the Smithsonian is madness. The worst thing is, this isn’t even the most horrible part of this stupid bill.

    14. SipMyCoolAid on

      What happened to cutting down on wasteful spending. Well just add this to the $3 Trillion dollars of debt this bill brings. And this is what happens when you have someone whose been bankrupt just as many times as he’s been divorced running your country into the ground.

    15. clover-the-clever on

      While they slash NASA’s budget, including missions that are already underway.

    16. How are they planning on moving it? The planes capable of moving a space shuttle have both been decommissioned and are in museums themselves and are thus no longer flight worthy. It is too tall and wide to travel on roads due to lights, overpasses, and bridges.

    17. NASA can’t move something that no longer belongs to them, nor the U.S. government, case closed.

    18. hopefaith816 on

      Wait! Isn’t this supposed to be the Administration that’s supposed to be stopping wasteful spending? Or did I misunderstand all that?

    19. AdditionalActuator81 on

      So defunding NASA studies but spending. 85 million on this… yeah seems like a great use of money.

    20. Straight-Ad6926 on

      Moving a space shuttle 1,500 miles just to spite Virginia what a stellar use of taxpayer dollars.

    21. DistractedPhoenix on

      I didn’t realize the key to horrible flooding was a decommissioned space shuttle

    22. I’ve wanted to go see it but haven’t had the time or money to make the trip… I am not going to TX so I guess we’d better hurry.

      What a petty bitch

    23. selfconstrukt on

      Why does it even need to be moved? The National Air & Space Museum in DC is the perfect place for it right now.

    Leave A Reply