"Laut Pentikäinen würden zwei zusätzliche Arbeitstage die staatlichen Steuereinnahmen um etwa 500 Millionen Euro pro Jahr steigern. Darüber hinaus sagte er, der öffentliche Sektor würde rund 100 Millionen Euro einsparen, indem sie für heutzutage keine Urlaubsboni mehr bezahlt.

    In dem Vorschlag würde die jährlichen Arbeitszeit der Mitarbeiter um etwa 0,6 Prozent steigen."

    https://yle.fi/a/74-20169267

    Von FinnishAlien

    Share.

    16 Kommentare

    1. Plane_Tour_770 on

      I never get these off anyway so I don’t care. I feel nobody celebrates these so it wouldn’t matter to many people.

    2. Long-Requirement8372 on

      The number of public holidays (arkipyhät) varies by year between seven and ten. Can the Federation of Finnish Enterprises show us that the Finnish state systematically has significantly better tax revenues on those years there are just seven or eight holidays than on those where there are ten? Show us the data, it should be easy to prove the claim.

    3. OK, as an employee, I will accept to work 0.6% more if businesses and those who have income from their profits agree to pay 0.6% more income tax.

      How is that?

    4. So which ones are getting cut? Easter? Midsummer? Christmas? I find it hard to believe those would be that productive to work on instead of having as holidays. This lobbying attempt is just for employers to have to pay less for their employees that do work on those days (cashiers, security guards etc).

    5. WafflesofDestitution on

      Fuck this cunt and all his cohorts. We need to strengthen the negotiating power of our unions, outlaw the Federation of Finnish Enterprises and jail all its members.

    6. Ah yes, the private sector looking out for the public sector. Fucking LOL.

      I propose that Suomen Yrittäjät go fuck themselves in the peehole and substantially raise wages so people will pay more taxes that the government can use for defense spending, if they are so inclined.

      A five percent wage raise across the board would bring in substantially more tax revenue than €500.000/year, I reckon.

    7. premature_eulogy on

      All we need to do to reach the defense spending goal is actually start calculating the hidden costs of our conscript system properly. The US gets away with counting things like military spouses‘ insurance as military spending, we need to stop being the „model student“ and straight-up count all lost potential tax revenue from conscription as well as Valtiokonttori insurance costs as explicit defense spending.

    8. EggParticular6583 on

      Can these fuckwits just … fuck off ?? every time they need another penny they come for our asses look up.

    Leave A Reply