Trump schlug mit „Amtsenthebungsdrohungen“ geschlagen, nachdem er den Iran bombardiert hatte Top -Demokraten fordern Maßnahmen gegen Trumps „verfassungswidrige“ Handlungen.

Nothing will happen, consequences never happen to Trump

Nothing of the sort will happen before the next congress, and even then, it’s a stretch.

AOC: The President’s disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers.

He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations.

It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.

[The full story <-](https://archive.ph/XTU7i#selection-747.0-747.276)

Not fucking fast enough! Do __SOMETHING__ or shut the fuck up! And I’m talking to you, Jeffries, in particular!

Unless the GOP gets some guts and stops worshiping Trump, it’s clearly not going anywhere.

Oh shit slap him with a fat sack of nothing

They don’t have the numbers. They will be unable to do that until the midterms, assuming there is an election and that sufficient numbers of Democrats win in both the House and the Senate.

Republicans only care about one amendment to the Constitution

He provides grounds for impeachment on nearly a daily basis. There should be a stack of articles already drafted and introduced into the record even if the GOP will block them all. It is one things Dems could be doing is documenting in the record of Congress all of his illegal actions and corruption.

this guy has been fighting impeachment for the last decade, what’s new?

For this but not all the crazy things happening domestically.

That’s gonna ruin the tour!

Which tour?

The Noble Peace Prize Tour!

Impeach this corrupt asshole yesterday

GOP is really gunna let this guy ruin the country aren’t they?

There is so much lying and gaslightning being done by this group of evil clowns that I don’t really believe that the U.S. has actually bombed Iran…

According to Google,

While only Congress has the power to formally „declare war,“ many U.S. presidents have ordered military actions in other countries without a specific congressional declaration of war. This has been a long-standing point of debate regarding the constitutional powers of the executive and legislative branches.

Some notable examples of presidents who have ordered military attacks without a formal declaration of war include:

* **Harry Truman:** Sent U.S. forces into combat in Korea in 1950, which he characterized as a „police action“ under the United Nations.
* **Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon:** Committed U.S. troops to Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War without a declaration of war. This led to the passage of the War Powers Resolution in 1973, intended to limit presidential authority in such situations.
* **Ronald Reagan:** Ordered the use of military force in various places, including Libya, Grenada, and Lebanon.
* **George H.W. Bush:** Directed an invasion of Panama to topple the government of Manuel Noriega. He also deployed troops to Kuwait in 1990, arguing he had the right to do so even without congressional approval, though Congress ultimately authorized the use of force for Operation Desert Storm.
* **Bill Clinton:** Ordered military actions in places like Bosnia and Kosovo (e.g., the bombing of Kosovo in 1999).
* **George W. Bush:** Ordered military action in Afghanistan and Iraq following the September 11th attacks, operating under Authorizations for the Use of Military Force (AUMFs) passed by Congress.
* **Barack Obama:** Ordered a military intervention in Libya in 2011 without seeking congressional approval, arguing it did not fall under the War Powers Resolution. He also authorized air strikes against the Islamic State in 2014, citing the 2002 AUMF.
* **Donald Trump:** Ordered missile strikes against Syria in 2017 after a chemical warfare attack, and a drone strike that killed Iranian General Qassem Soleimani in 2020.
* **Joe Biden:** Has cited AUMFs and Article II powers for military actions against Iran-backed militant groups in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and the Red Sea.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 attempts to define and limit the President’s power to commit U.S. forces to hostilities without congressional consent, requiring notification to Congress within 48 hours and setting a 60-day limit on deployments without congressional authorization. However, presidents have often interpreted their constitutional powers as Commander-in-Chief broadly, leading to ongoing debates and controversies over military actions abroad.