Share.

    37 Kommentare

    1. AuthorityAnarchyYes on

      I don’t believe a SCOTUS has been this politically biased since right before the US Civil War.

      I do hope this isn’t foreshadowing.

    2. Colonel-Mooseknuckle on

      Hmm, wonder why. Mitch McConnell blocked a democratic nominee, and then Trump stuffed the court full of his nominees. Nominees, who muss pass a litmus test before being considered for this life-long position where they „impartially“ interpret the law.

    3. Duh. McTurtle started the packing by refusing to even consider the Garland nomination.

      „_Oh, oh! It’s too close to election time!_“ And then when RBG passes away even closer to election time (IIRC) they rush in a conservative.

      Power grabbing, intransigent pigs!

    4. moreliketurdcrapley on

      Because they’re not politically neutral and we’re stuck with it.

    5. I would accuse the US of mass lead poisoning if they saw the SCOTUS as politically neutral.

    6. SCOTUS: We think the president can break any laws he wants because he is above the law as a god king.

      The people: SCOTUS is a partisan political organization serving the interests of fascist authoritarians.

      SCOTUS: Why is there a crisis of credibility in the courts!?

    7. ‘20% agreed, 58% disagreed – and the rest either said they did not know or did not respond.’

      That’s pretty funny.  Dark humour funny of course:

    8. Emergency-Volume-861 on

      Come on. Who wasted their time polling that. It’s the most obvious conclusion ever that they aren’t neutral.

      I was raised being told the Supreme Court was the highest law in the land. That the justices were impartial, neutral. Beyond reproach! A job so important that it had a lifetime term.Thirty years later I see justice Thomas’s batshit insane right wing conspiracy theory wife doing all manners of wild stoking the fires for Q non and MAGA behind the scenes puppet master shit and his own laundry list of accepting ridiculous extravagant bribes and I’m over here thinking oh gawd to myself, we’re so cooked.

      Next comes justice Roberts, the brown nose Trump sycophant and the hearings for the next justices, and Brett Kavanaugh, and Kavanaugh getting confirmed with a 50-48 vote in the senate. I knew then that we were beyond cooked and moved into the horrendously fucked area.

      The saga continued as we all know and here we are.

      The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a ruling that limits the EPA’s authority to regulate wastewater discharges, potentially allowing for increased levels of sewage and other pollutants in some waterways.

      Guess we’re shit out of luck too.

    9. It never has been but at least it wasn’t as completely biased as it is now.

    10. NeedleworkerChoice89 on

      We’re far enough into 2 Inept 2 Fascist to be well beyond this type of statement.

      Republicans hate Democracy, the end. Whether it’s filling courts with partisan religious hacks, gerrymandering, taking away the ability to vote for non-white people, or wholesale taking away rights, that’s their entire thing.

      I challenge anyone to point to a single major piece of Republican legislation in the past decade that was cut-and-dry designed to make *anything* better for the average American.

    11. Outrageous_Agent_576 on

      Because it’s not. Paid off justices. MAGA justices. Definitely unqualified justices. And leadership that has no backbone, and yields to Executive branch whims!

    12. NoNoTheOtherOne on

      What?! This is incredible news to me! How, how could this me true…

      But, but they swore an oath to the Constitution! 

    13. PersonalityNo4679 on

      Again, they need experts to tell them something the rest of us knew since he was left on the ballot

    14. LivingDracula on

      They literally legalized bribes with citizens united and changing the definition of „gratudity“ after one of them go caught with a half million RV bribe…

      Oh and they reversed the constitution with regards to presidential immunity and insurrection

      Exactly what is neutral about any of that?

    15. Wow, overturning 50 year precedent without any substantive change in statute or the constitution but only because the composition of the court has changed.

      That inherently makes you look like a political body rather than a judicial one.

    16. Turtle-Express on

      Judges appointed by politicians aren’t politically neutral? Who would have guessed. Next you’re going to tell me water is wet…

    17. RandoRandomRando1 on

      :O what?! Say it ain’t so…. Why is the government months behind its people? I think we all realized when all 3 branches were occupied by MAGA republicans?

    18. The Chief Justice just decided on a whim that he didn’t need to be part of Trump’s post insurrection impeachment trial

    19. keepthepace on

      A non partisan supreme court would rule only through unanimous decisions. 4-5 decisions are a symptom of a dysfunctional court.

    Leave A Reply