Nachweis der Erstellung: Ist es auf Mikrostrategy anwendbar?
Nachweis der Erstellung: Ist es auf Mikrostrategy anwendbar?
4 Kommentare
tldr; MicroStrategy’s Executive Chairman, Michael Saylor, dismissed the idea of publishing proof-of-reserves (PoR) for the company’s Bitcoin holdings, citing security concerns and potential liabilities. Unlike crypto exchanges, MicroStrategy operates as a publicly traded company and adheres to SEC regulations, which already require detailed financial disclosures. Saylor argued that revealing wallet addresses could compromise security and mislead stakeholders. The company remains focused on its strategy of raising capital to acquire more Bitcoin as a long-term appreciating asset.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
lol Chainlink PoR doesn’t expose wallet addresses. Ark and 21shares already do it.
[If he doesn’t do it he’s hiding something](https://imgur.com/a/yZf1PYe)
Considering how trivial it is to fake, it’s applicable only to scams.
Michael Saylor criticizes on-chain proof-of-reserves for institutions, citing security risks and the potential for undermining security by exposing wallet addresses. This aligns with concerns about privacy and security in crypto transparency efforts. However, MicroStrategy’s extensive Bitcoin holdings, over $59.9 billion, have been publicly identified through third-party analysis, demonstrating a level of transparency despite Saylor’s reservations.
* [Proof-of-Reserves: Is it applicable to MicroStrategy? : r/CryptoCurrency](https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/1l6p3yj/proofofreserves_is_it_applicable_to_microstrategy/)
^(This is a bot made by [Critique AI](https://critique-labs.ai). If you want vetted information like this on all content you browse, [download our extension](https://critiquebrowser.app).)