> The court holds for the foregoing reasons that IEEPA does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders. This conclusion entitles Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law; as the court further finds
no genuine dispute as to any material fact, summary judgment will enter against the United States. The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.
pgm_01 on
Finally!
The constitution is clear on the issue. The limited circumstances under which Congress granted the President power over tariffs has not been met. You don’t get to create a national emergency out of nothing in order to abuse the law.
aerodeck on
Donaldt Rump is a sleepy moron who hates America.
thebabes2 on
So … what will he do next because you know he won’t just accept this and move on?
Jamizon1 on
Sit DOWN, TACO-boy!
HedgehogOk7722 on
Cue the outrage from people who want a king, and for themselves to be serfs.
495orange on
A Trump appointee with a conflict of interest. Say it isn’t so.
robotdanny on
This is 100% Trumps only way out. He can’t look weak now and reverse course but he can complain about the courts and how America is a sucker.
TransiTorri on
Translation from the court – Get your shine box Tariff Tot
Awkward_Definition97 on
Senor Taco from the Gulf of Mexico has been denied
odysseusaurus on
Lol does that mean prices are gonna go back down? Damage has already been done
DowntimeJEM on
Took their sweet time of course
RiseDelicious3556 on
Does anything the courts decide matter with this guy?
l0stInwrds on
Trump will be the butt of the joke at the G7 in Canada.
Jarsky2 on
Anyone craving tacos?
Curt_in_wpg on
Ha Ha, get fucked your orange shitstain.
Sincerely from Canada.
UltimateToa on
Cool, when will they get reversed? (They wont)
topgun966 on
The economic and global political damage this has done can’t just be undone. Billionaires made billions off the pump and dumps, draining 401 (k) s. Companies laid off 10s of thousands due to economic uncertainty.
-CJF- on
>The Trump administration has justified the tariffs by citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, or IEEPA, which gives the president the power to regulate imports during certain emergency situations. But the court on Wednesday rejected the government’s interpretation of the law, and said it would be unconstitutional for any law passed by Congress to give the president blanket authority to set tariffs.
Wouldn’t that also violate the Major Questions Doctrine? SCOTUS used similar reasoning to prevent the Secretary of Education from forgiving student loans stating that matters of great economic importance must be *explicitly* approved by Congress.
polishgoku on
Lmao bros going to go off on his app tonight. Caps button is toast.
snapplejacks23 on
Every single morning. Check the news. Is he dead yet? Is he dead yet? I’m so ready for that morning.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
25 Kommentare
Womp womp…
He was just going to Taco anyways..
I wish this was decided a while ago.
I was literally laid off today primarily because the company was hit hard with tariffs and economic uncertainty due to the flux in tariff rates.
I hate this president. So much.
That should make Señor Taco real happy. /s
Taco time!
Unanimous ruling by 3 Judge panel (Obama, Reagan, Trump appointees) in the U.S. Court of International Trade:
https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf
> The court holds for the foregoing reasons that IEEPA does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders. This conclusion entitles Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law; as the court further finds
no genuine dispute as to any material fact, summary judgment will enter against the United States. The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.
Finally!
The constitution is clear on the issue. The limited circumstances under which Congress granted the President power over tariffs has not been met. You don’t get to create a national emergency out of nothing in order to abuse the law.
Donaldt Rump is a sleepy moron who hates America.
So … what will he do next because you know he won’t just accept this and move on?
Sit DOWN, TACO-boy!
Cue the outrage from people who want a king, and for themselves to be serfs.
A Trump appointee with a conflict of interest. Say it isn’t so.
This is 100% Trumps only way out. He can’t look weak now and reverse course but he can complain about the courts and how America is a sucker.
Translation from the court – Get your shine box Tariff Tot
Senor Taco from the Gulf of Mexico has been denied
Lol does that mean prices are gonna go back down? Damage has already been done
Took their sweet time of course
Does anything the courts decide matter with this guy?
Trump will be the butt of the joke at the G7 in Canada.
Anyone craving tacos?
Ha Ha, get fucked your orange shitstain.
Sincerely from Canada.
Cool, when will they get reversed? (They wont)
The economic and global political damage this has done can’t just be undone. Billionaires made billions off the pump and dumps, draining 401 (k) s. Companies laid off 10s of thousands due to economic uncertainty.
>The Trump administration has justified the tariffs by citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, or IEEPA, which gives the president the power to regulate imports during certain emergency situations. But the court on Wednesday rejected the government’s interpretation of the law, and said it would be unconstitutional for any law passed by Congress to give the president blanket authority to set tariffs.
Wouldn’t that also violate the Major Questions Doctrine? SCOTUS used similar reasoning to prevent the Secretary of Education from forgiving student loans stating that matters of great economic importance must be *explicitly* approved by Congress.
Lmao bros going to go off on his app tonight. Caps button is toast.
Every single morning. Check the news. Is he dead yet? Is he dead yet? I’m so ready for that morning.