Share.

    25 Kommentare

    1. Tommy__want__wingy on

      I wish this was decided a while ago.

      I was literally laid off today primarily because the company was hit hard with tariffs and economic uncertainty due to the flux in tariff rates.

      I hate this president. So much.

    2. Rock-n-roll-Kevin on

      Unanimous ruling by 3 Judge panel (Obama, Reagan, Trump appointees) in the U.S. Court of International Trade:

      https://www.cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/files/25-66.pdf

      > The court holds for the foregoing reasons that IEEPA does not authorize any of the Worldwide, Retaliatory, or Trafficking Tariff Orders. The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs. The Trafficking Tariffs fail because they do not deal with the threats set forth in those orders. This conclusion entitles Plaintiffs to judgment as a matter of law; as the court further finds
      no genuine dispute as to any material fact, summary judgment will enter against the United States. The challenged Tariff Orders will be vacated and their operation permanently enjoined.

    3. Finally!

      The constitution is clear on the issue. The limited circumstances under which Congress granted the President power over tariffs has not been met. You don’t get to create a national emergency out of nothing in order to abuse the law.

    4. So … what will he do next because you know he won’t just accept this and move on?

    5. HedgehogOk7722 on

      Cue the outrage from people who want a king, and for themselves to be serfs.

    6. This is 100% Trumps only way out. He can’t look weak now and reverse course but he can complain about the courts and how America is a sucker.

    7. odysseusaurus on

      Lol does that mean prices are gonna go back down? Damage has already been done

    8. The economic and global political damage this has done can’t just be undone. Billionaires made billions off the pump and dumps, draining 401 (k) s. Companies laid off 10s of thousands due to economic uncertainty.

    9. >The Trump administration has justified the tariffs by citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, or IEEPA, which gives the president the power to regulate imports during certain emergency situations. But the court on Wednesday rejected the government’s interpretation of the law, and said it would be unconstitutional for any law passed by Congress to give the president blanket authority to set tariffs.

      Wouldn’t that also violate the Major Questions Doctrine? SCOTUS used similar reasoning to prevent the Secretary of Education from forgiving student loans stating that matters of great economic importance must be *explicitly* approved by Congress.

    10. snapplejacks23 on

      Every single morning. Check the news. Is he dead yet? Is he dead yet? I’m so ready for that morning.

    Leave A Reply