Share.

    22 Kommentare

    1. > Litman co-founded Run for Something, an organization that recruits and trains progressives age 40 and under to seek elected office, the day Trump was inaugurated in 2017. Since then, the group has sought to dismantle the gerontocracy, helping to elect more than 1,500 people across 49 states. More than 200,000 people have signed up to explore a run for office, more than 40,000 of whom have signed up since Trump won last November.

    2. WontThinkStraight on

      The US can do better than a choice between authoritarianism and a gerontocracy.

    3. Virtual-Pie5732 on

      I do align more with Democrats but I also shouldn’t be reluctant to vote for you. Coasting by because the other side is bad can only work for long and look at where that got us.

      Let’s start with term limits and age limits. At the very least if you hit retirement age you shouldn’t be running for any office.

    4. I agree. We got a 78 yr old undiagnosed dementia patient in charge because of this kind of public behavior

    5. We had Harris running. That wasn’t based on seniority and they still lost. They need more than that.

    6. Ohnoherewego13 on

      Oh yes! We shouldn’t be picking people for top positions in the Senate and House based off of how long they’ve been there. This whole „their turn“ thing is part of the reason we’re in this mess.

    7. FizzgigsRevenge on

      DNC: diversity is our strength!

      DNC definition of diversity: Boomer millionaires, older Gen X millionaires, several silent generation millionaires, no more than 3-5 younger Gen X and Millennials so the kids feel included.

    8. Constant-Kick6183 on

      Yes how dare they pick repeat winners who have the most experience and knowledge.

    9. StormOk7544 on

      Just can’t run a fossil for president anymore. If age looks like an issue in a race for a seat in Congress, that would be bad too. Otherwise, I think age is a bit of a red herring. It’s not something that by itself makes a candidate better or worse usually. AOC, Crockett, and others were in that super cringe Smash Bros meme a couple months ago or whatever, so it’s not like the younger crowd has a complete mastery over the messaging and stuff either.

    10. pontiacfirebird92 on

      Run for Something won’t endorse you if you’re over 40 so I guess this tracks

    11. nowimnihil13 on

      Just like the rest of the populace, politicians should retire around 65-70, especially if they made politicking their entire career.

    12. Another clueless elitist pretending to have found a magic solution to the Dems‘ problems. As usual, the clueless elitist misses the point. She thinks it’s all about a way to „fix the Democratic Party’s brand“; „to change who runs as Democrats – more & better messengers.“ (Irony: resume includes „Hillary Clinton’s email director“.)

      As long as Democrats ignore the root causes (no, not things like racism or misogyny or homophobia or „Christian“ fundamentalism; we’ve had all those for 250 years and it never led to Trump) they are merely engaging in performative and useless posturing.  There’s an old saying that just because you’re paranoid, it does not mean that no one is following you.  Just because someone is a racist or misogynist or homophobe or „Christian“ fundamentalist does not mean that they had no legitimate major issues that drove them toward a charlatan like Trump.  Unless the Democrats commit to the things that most Americans say they really want – not things like unisex bathrooms and custom-tailored pronouns – they will dig themselves deeper into the hole they have created. Either commit to fair tax structure, sensible gun control, universal health care, good public education, living minimum wage, support for unions, and other basic programs that most voters say they want, or continue the long, painful slide into total irrelevance.  It’s that simple. Plus the Gaza thing.

       

    13. And run for something’s unwillingness to assist new candidates over age 39 is theirs.

    14. Zazen_Satori_Gaming on

      I have a wild idea for Democrats!!!

      Pick leaders based on actual inspiring leadership ability, intelligence and especially charisma! Not how long they’ve been alive and a Democrat or how good they are at kissing corporate ass at fund raising events!

      Do that and suddenly Democrat isn’t synonymous with Chuck Schumer’s craven cowardice.

    15. Constant_Natural3304 on

      No, your downfall is you refuse to fight for your country and expect there will be a next election.

    16. Everyone – red or blue – SAYS age is a problem (actually voting is a different story).

      Wouldn’t it be great to be the party that listens?

      This country needs an elected official age cap of the average life expectancy of your constituency. Running for senate and your state has a life expectancy of 70 – you’re done at 70. The country is sitting at 79 so no presidency after 79.

    Leave A Reply