Die von Sen. Sandy Salmon, R-Janesville, eingeführte Senatsversammlung 3, bittet den Obersten Gerichtshof der USA, Obergebell gegen Hodges, den wegweisenden Bundesverfahren, der 2015 die gleichgeschlechtliche Ehe legalisierte.

    https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/08/iowa-legislature-senate-resolution-calls-to-overturn-same-sex-marriage-sandy-salmon/83511236007/

    Share.

    30 Kommentare

    1. invalidpassword on

      With the GOP in control its always one step forward and a marathon back. Biblical law (Christian Reconstructionism) is creeping into our lives. The irony being they worship a man worse than the mythical Satan.

    2. traceyandmeower on

      This makes me feel sick. Why can’t they accept ppl love their own ways.

    3. Boring_Investment597 on

      Annnnddd the GOP continues to take away freedom from people.

      Fewer rights for some means fewer rights for all.

    4. The Bible doesn’t support the idea of „one man one woman“ marriage unless you are an elder in the church (1 Timothy 3:2). The ones defending that idea to apply to all marriages are women given to jealousy. They’re confidently wrong, and violating the proscription against women teaching. A hypocrite.

      When two become one flesh, a man marrying a second wife also brings her into two become one flesh. Polygamy is only condemned by the Bible in that it could lead a man’s heart astray, not that they sinned by having multiple wives.

      As for her petition, she hasn’t demonstrated actionable harms. All that she has is it offending her feelings and conviction. If a man’s free exercise of religion is that he can marry other men, Congress has no right to prohibit it.

    5. There ‚ya go, Peter Thiel! Glad you love your money and your bizarre Will to Power more than anything else.

    6. A state senate resoltuon is a not a court case. It states the postion, but it doesnt do anything.

    7. J-the-Kidder on

      It was a coin flip between same sex and biracial marriage. I’m shocked it took this long.

    8. Clubsandiches on

      I think this is just continued bullshit fluff like “ hey, what else can we do? How about this?“

    9. Professional-Buy2970 on

      Historical tidbit: The original Pride was a riot against the government. This is not a community you want to push against the wall. And they have more allies now than they dd before.

    10. >“As I said on the floor earlier this year they will continue to strip rights and freedoms from their fellow Iowans until none remain…And they will continue until they are relieved of the burden of Governing.“

      >Rep. Aime Wichtendahl (D), Iowa’s first out transgender state lawmaker

      I recommend we relieve them at the very next opportunity.

    11. imnotmichaelshannon on

      Right on schedule. This era of history is nothing if not predictable.

    12. My guess is that there are enough Republicans in the so-called ‚moderate wing‘ that are also from purple districts that will oppose this. Particularly in the Senate should it ever get through the House. I don’t see the Speaker pursuing this – it puts his own caucus in a bind if he does. It also likely hurts the GOP politically since those in purple districts would be the worst-affected.

    13. no_kids-and-3_money on

      Fuck you Sandy Salmon – you shit. How many same sex couples have tried to overturn opposite sex marriage? So shut the hell up and stop threatening other people’s way of life that have never tried to stop you from living your’s.

    14. It only took four months for the thing everyone assured me would never happen to casually happen. Funny that, huh

    15. WhiskeredAristocat on

      I will never forget celebrating as an ally with my chosen family and wept as they gained access to rights every human should have. I am heartbroken that I’m going to see them lose that right only ten years later.

    16. BadgeOfDishonour on

      „It’s settled law, they’ll never come for SS Marriage.“

      And yet, here we are. Exactly as predicted.

    17. Actual_Intercourse on

      I wonder if (R)s are struggling with their sexuality

      oh wait

      they always are

    18. That case may have set the stage for legalization but Congress ratified it which made it actual law. The Supreme Court cannot do a thing against it – that is Congress’s job.

    19. MrFunktasticc on

      To all the people who told me „bOtH sIdEs“ while I was canvassing for Harris – eat a big bag of baby dicks.

    20. crappieman62 on

      I am 63 yrs old and for the life of me I dont understand why poeple give a rats ass about what other people are doing with there lives. God knows for a fact that I have an issue with keeping up with my own sidewalk , jeeez.

    21. I’m a lesbian trans woman that WA state recognizes as a woman on all my documents. I’m also married to a woman

      I wonder if these pieces of shit would say my marriage is valid or invalid lol

    22. BrookerTheWitt on

      I thought the Supreme Court needed to hear a new case to overturn an old one. Have they ever just randomly decided to overturn a case without it relating to a current case?

    23. RealHooman2187 on

      Wasn’t same sex marriage codified during Biden’s term? Seems to me like that goes against the argument of this resolution.

    24. “Nobody’s going to roll back same sex marriage, you need to chill out and stop believing everything the media tells you” – famous last words

    Leave A Reply