Close Menu
    Technik

    Sotomayor sagt, KI sei „eine schlechte Sache“, wenn es darum geht, Entscheidungen des Obersten Gerichtshofs vorherzusagen, was zeigt, dass „wir viel zu vorhersehbar sind“


    Sotomayor sagt, KI sei „eine schlechte Sache“, wenn es darum geht, Entscheidungen des Obersten Gerichtshofs vorherzusagen, was zeigt, dass „wir viel zu vorhersehbar sind“

    https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5824618-sotomayor-ai-judiciary-experiment/

    View 26 Comments

    26 Kommentare

    3. frommethodtomadness on

      They’re way too corrupt, far Right extremist, and most of it’s members are illegitimate. The Court needs to be completely reformed, increased by at least 20 Justices, and the shadow docket needs to be outlawed.

    5. ChiBeerGuy on

      The only people that think the Supreme Court isn’t political, is the Supreme Court.

    8. Ehgadsman on

      for fucks sake lady this isn’t a contest for originality its a fight for democracy

    10. DataCassette on

      Oh oh oh conservatives are doing some evil shit and it’s going to be 6-3 or at least 5-4 I’m a predictive genius /s

    13. Perfecshionism on

      They should be predictable.

      It just should not be predictable along party lines.

    14. Suspicious_Safe7647 on

      Didn’t they make a movie about this with Chris Pratt?

      A Judge has to be -Impartial- which means at times they have to be unpredictable.

      This sounds like a way for the tech bro dipshits to create yet another gambling scam. Can old politicians stop falling for this garbage? There’s a bunch of 20/30 year olds out there who have stolen millions from the working class thanks to this.

      Don’t reward idiocy.

    15. africanlivedit on

      Still insane to me we can’t actually see the court in session via CSPAN.

    16. OkSmile on

      There is predictability based upon law and precedent, then there is predictability based upon ideology and predetermined decisions. The predictability discussed here is the latter.

      Which begs the question on the former. The fact that the actual law and precedent means less than ideology means that there is in fact no real rational basis in law. There is only partisanship and rationalization.

    19. TheShipEliza on

      Most of my life you can count on them fabricating fascist bullshit. It has been an issue for 100 years

    20. prof_dr_mr_obvious on

      The Supreme Court should be predictable. The erratic, non sensical, partizan, corrupt shite we have seen the past years are *the problem*.

    21. Get_your_grape_juice on

      Predictable is a *good* thing. Democracy needs to be predictable.

    22. sundogmooinpuppy on

      Alito and Thomas will always rule for what the republican party wants. They are beyond predictable.

    23. onyxlabyrinth1979 on

      It feels less like an AI problem and more like a transparency one. If decisions follow consistent patterns, models will pick that up. The uncomfortable part is seeing it quantified.

      The question is whether that predictability is fairness and stability, or something that can be gamed once it’s obvious.

    25. Admirable-Sink-2622 on

      Well, if you’re following the law, then it should be absolutely predictable, no? 🤔

    26. 100king on

      They’ve got like one major document that they need to empower. Doesn’t get more predictable than that. 

    Leave A Reply