Close Menu
    Kanada

    RCMP testet in aller Stille von der KI erstellte Berichte aus Körperkamera-Audio


    RCMP testet in aller Stille von der KI erstellte Berichte aus Körperkamera-Audio

    https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/rcmp-quietly-testing-ai-drafted-reports-from-body-camera-audio

    View 14 Comments

    14 Kommentare

    3. GhostOfJasper on

      Makes sense but there should be human review when whatever is on the transcript becomes important. But to save on labour and crush through daily camera footage, totally. Resources can be better utilized for other work than listening to hours upon hours of footage to transcribe it manually for record keeping purposes. 

    4. OrangeRising on

      Is this the same as what doctors can use to summarize their meetings with patients?

    5. ITSA-GONGSHOW on

      I don’t like AI in policing like I do t like automatic speed traps. Policing should be done by police. They should be busy doing admin and focus on real crime when it happens.

    6. Visible-Air-2359 on

      They better have humans monitoring all of it in case the witch that turns cops into frogs moved from Utah to Canada.

    8. zanderkerbal on

      How long do we want to bet until we see the first wrongful convictions due to hallucinated police reports? One year? Two?

      And how much do you want to bet when it happens the AI tool will be blamed while the officers who blindly trusted it and the administrators who approved it face no consequences for the innocent lives they ruined?

    9. Gears_and_Beers on

      As long as they are keeping the raw files somewhere that’s fine.

      Cant have someone’s notes about a video/audio recording being the only record of it, worse when that someone isn’t something you can cross examine.

    10. whistleridge on

      There’s nothing ominous about this. It’s one box you click, and it gives you an instant working transcript. It’s amazing, because it lets you scan the video a lot faster for substantive sections, and to get a good sense of what is said.

      You still need a certified transcript for trial, which requires a certified transcriptionist.

      This is a total non-story. 10/10, ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️, exactly the sort of limited tasks that AI SHOULD be used for. All it does is save everyone time and money, while creating no prejudice to anyone.

    11. Scarlet004 on

      Considering the amount of hallucination inherent in AI, it’s a bad idea. Even if they promise to have someone look over the summaries later because it would start out with earnest supervision of the AI and end with filing the summaries unseen.

      A lot of people are already giving AI genius status for every thing it produces and it’s often wrong with confidence. I only see that getting worse.

      If they find an officer made a mistake, they can go back and make sure it was the first, it’s a pretty small subset, with a finite set of parameters. It would be a next to impossible step, when talking about AI summarizing everything.

    12. Slowreloader on

      We use Granola at work, and there’s always one or two mistakes. It also won’t necessarily make sense 100% unless you were present.

      Whatever tool the RCMP decides to use, you would hope there will be proper human review. But given their track record, and also the fact that the RCMP may be transferring these reports to other agencies like Crown counsel or social services, you wonder how much context will be lost down the line of communication.

    13. Alive_Salary4970 on

      My doctors office tried to convince me to allow them to make notes on my visit with AI. I refused because I see misinformation and misinterpretation by AI online and can’t be sure of what’s being recorded. SMH

    Leave A Reply