Close Menu
    Europa

    USA streben Zugang zu drei neuen Verteidigungsgebieten in Grönland an: Bericht


    USA streben Zugang zu drei neuen Verteidigungsgebieten in Grönland an: Bericht

    https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/us-seeks-access-to-3-new-defense-areas-in-greenland-report/3877927

    Von AttorneyOk5749

    View 26 Comments

    26 Kommentare

    2. rTpure on

      Here is a country that is threatening to invade and annex our territory. Hey let’s give them more military access to said territory!

    4. pickus_dickus on

      Donnie have recently said the US don’t need NATO. Greenland is an indirect member of NATO through Denmark. The us doesn’t need NATO which mean they can’t have shit on Greenland.

    5. Ada_Pearce on

      Absolutely not, after seeing his iran disaster the last thing any country should do is let him have more military bases

    7. EINFACH_NUR_DAEMLICH on

      They should seek access to three new ways to go fuck themselves.

    8. Link50L on

      USA: „We’re going to leave NATO because we don’t need you and you suck.“

      Also the USA: „We want more bases on your terrritory.“

    9. Blubbolo on

      Its time to be reasonable adults and sit down to trade.

      The US gets a new base but they have to send to the sun anyone who agreed, supported or funded the pedophile.

    10. Crazy-Canuck463 on

      Sure. Once you fix the massive fuck up in the middle east you caused.

    12. fiendishrabbit on

      Note that these are not new rights or really anything new. This is merely negotiation teams trying to repair the damage caused by the Trump government.

      Since WWII there has been an extensive defensive treaty between Denmark and US (reinforcing the 1918 treaty where the US recognizes danish sovereignty over Greenland) where the US have had rights to establish military bases and defensive areas as needed (under the supervision of NATO and under negotiations with Denmark).

      The only reason why there is only 1 US military base on Greenland at the moment is because the US military gradually dismantled their military presence until only the current Pituffik Space Base was left (to provide communication and missile warning coverage over the north pole)

    14. Bitter_Particular_75 on

      Would you let Russia have 3 new defence areas in Greenland?

      No?

      What’s the difference?

    19. Korkikrac on

      Is it normal for a sovereign country to have a foreign army on its own soil? Especially when that army threatens annexation. Things have been upside down in Europe for far too long.

    20. dakjelle on

      They used to have several pretty big bases there and numerous radar stations.

      And they’re welcome to return as it always was the agreement.

      Which is why it never made sense that Trump wanted.. Nevermind it’s Trump and the word sense.. Hahaha

    22. WhisperingHammer on

      Inwould assume those are the areas they intend to ravage for materials.

    24. Aromatic-Deer3886 on

      Every one of them must be denied. America is a threat not an ally. We need to be preparing our defence of Greenland.

    25. Euclidisthebomb on

      Trump is almost certainly poking at this issue in order to generate more „plausible“ reasons to ditch NATO.

      I believe the smart course of action is also a reasonable one which is for Denmark to engage in consultation with local Greenlanders over the course of the next several months. Upon conclusion of these consultations it then would reply to America as a precursor to any negotiations.

      Regretfully that legal and justifiable course of action will take the matter post mid terms. By then there will be an understanding of the situation in America and this will really guide Denmark and other NATO allies.

    Leave A Reply