Das Pentagon erwägt, die Militärhilfe der Ukraine in den Nahen Osten umzuleiten

The Pentagon is considering whether to divert weapons intended for Ukraine to the Middle East as the war in Iran depletes some of the U.S. military’s most critical munitions, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Although a final decision to redirect the equipment has not yet been made, the shift would highlight the growing trade-offs required to sustain the war with Iran, where U.S. Central Command has hit more than 9,000 targets in just under four weeks of fighting.

The weapons that could be diverted away from Ukraine include air defense interceptor missiles, ordered through a NATO program [launched last year](https://archive.is/o/sXjJN/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/07/26/europe-ukraine-us-weapons-deal/) in which partner countries buy U.S. arms for Kyiv, the three people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe the Pentagon’s sensitive deliberations.

The Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative has ensured a flow of select military equipment to Kyiv even as the Trump administration has cut off most of the Pentagon’s direct security assistance.

In a statement, a Pentagon spokesperson said the Defense Department would “ensure that U.S. forces and those of our allies and partners have what they need to fight and win” but declined to otherwise comment.

Olga Stefanishyna, Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States, said in a statement that Kyiv was keeping partners apprised of its needs, including on air defense, but understood the “period of considerable uncertainty” during the war.

“Any disruptions at the outset of recent operations in the Middle East have been mitigated,” Stefanishyna said.

In response to questions, a NATO official did not address whether the military alliance is aware of or concerned about a potential rerouting of U.S. equipment. The official said in an email that countries “continue to contribute to PURL and equipment is continuously flowing into Ukraine.”

Since last summer, the official said, the initiative has supplied 75 percent of the missiles for Ukraine’s Patriot batteries and nearly all of the ammunition used in its other air defense systems.

Kyiv’s chief European backers have taken the lead on funding and arming Ukrainian forces since President Donald Trump took office. The PURL initiative, brokered last year by NATO, offered a work-around for Ukraine to keep getting U.S. weaponry, so long as the Europeans pay the bill. The deal provided Trump a political win and a way for NATO to quell fears that Kyiv could be left exposed by the administration’s ambition for a peace deal with Russia.

European nations now provide the bulk of military support to Kyiv, including some direct provisions separate from NATO. But PURL supplies Ukraine with key U.S. equipment, including high-end munitions and scarce air defense interceptors. Countries have committed about $4 billion for Ukraine through the program, according to a U.S. official.

Since the U.S. attack on Iran began on Feb. 28, European capitals have become concerned that Washington is rapidly using up its existing munitions, a pace of fire that could delay their own orders and disrupt deliveries of U.S. systems to Ukraine under PURL, two European diplomats said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe their private concerns.

“They are really burning through munitions, so there are questions now about how much they will keep providing through the deal,” one of the diplomats said.

Among the most in-demand munitions of the war are high-end air defense interceptors, including the Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, systems. The U.S. military has redirected such missiles from other parts of the world, including Europe and East Asia, to U.S. Central Command — which is responsible for U.S. operations in the Middle East — bolstering its defenses against Iranian drone and ballistic missile attacks.

These assets are also among the most coveted by Ukraine, which faces a continual barrage of Russian strikes on its cities and infrastructure. One of the people familiar with the Pentagon’s internal calculations said that PURL deliveries were likely to continue but that future packages may be missing air defense capabilities, as the U.S. seeks to replenish its stocks and those of allies in the Persian Gulf.

“The policy debate is how much you give to Ukraine,” a second person said. “This is a real live discussion.”

It was not clear whether U.S. shipments would be delayed and fulfilled later or entirely diverted. The Pentagon can redirect such deliveries in the case of an urgent military need but would need to notify lawmakers, the U.S. official said.

The Pentagon has sought to rapidly increase production of key munitions following the war in Iran but is constrained by the U.S. defense industry’s limited ability to surge in times of crisis. The Trump administration is preparing a supplemental defense budget request for Congress that the Defense Department initially proposed be over $200 billion, [The Washington Post has reported.](https://archive.is/o/sXjJN/https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/03/18/iran-cost-budget-pentagon/)

In January, Congress passed $400 million in additional long-term weapons aid to Ukraine, funding a separate program that the Pentagon intended to cut. The Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) contracts U.S. firms to build weapons that are delivered directly to Kyiv, though the orders can sometimes take years to fulfill.

According to a notice that the Pentagon sent to Congress, reviewed by The Post, the Defense Department has used some of the European PURL money for other capabilities lawmakers that intended to be paid for by American funding through USAI.

It remained unclear, the U.S. official said, whether the Pentagon was using the PURL funding in addition to, or instead of, the money Congress had already passed to deliver such weaponry.

Separately, the Pentagon notified Congress on Monday that it intended to divert about $750 million in funding provided by NATO countries through the PURL program to restock the U.S. military’s own inventories, rather than to send additional assistance to Ukraine, according to two U.S. officials.

The first official said it was unclear whether European countries participating in the initiative understood how the funding was being spent.

*Michael Birnbaum contributed to this report.*

The article actually describes it but the title is wrong. The US does not give aid to Ukraine. The US sells weapons to NATO countries. These countries then provide them as aid. 

“ Good move “ –  putin 

How to lose your allies in Europe 101

I’ve said it before and here it is again, the United Staes of Nam Erica are UNTRUSTWORTHY.

How about sending money from Middle East to Ukraine to win against facist Putin

Kraznovs plan all along.
Russia First 🤬

Anything to help Putin.

Also: headline is generous to the US here.
They are proving they aren’t even reliable patterns is arms.

What aid 😀

This might just win „worst title of the year“ award

It’s amazing how every effect of Trumps actions happen to help Russia.

what aid?

Let’s be clear: Trumpistan/MAGAstan (don’t mistake with USA) stopped providing aid to Ukraine ever since Putin’s Orange Puppet started destroying the White House and started building his Big Beautiful Ballroom after holding a Great Gatsby Party when millions of Americans were without pay during the first government shutdown.

there is no reward for them.trump will never be on ukraines side.his best pal is putin.