Kanada lehnte ihren Antrag auf Daueraufenthalt ab. Ihre Aufgaben wurden vom KI-Rezensenten der Einwanderungsbehörde zusammengestellt
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/canada-rejected-her-permanent-residence-application-her-job-duties-were-made-up–by-immigrations-ai-reviewer/article_3f1ea5be-0b3d-4541-ac00-0a1b8484d877.html
9 Kommentare
This is how they’re going to modernize the public service, guys! And fix Phoenix!
AI is useful, but you can’t literally believe everything it says. That is the reason I use it to get ideas, then decide what to do on my own, not just do what the AI tells me to do.
Bypass >> [https://archive.ph/3CxXR](https://archive.ph/3CxXR)
I just had someone use AI to write an email to a district manager as they were seeking a transfer. Literally everything on it was not apart of their job duties. Stop using AI and write the shit yourself.
Who wants to link the more informed comments from civil service who state that they pick options from a drop down, triggering a script that fills in certain verbiage based on their choice?
You know, the comment that accurately demonstrated that this is a witch hunt based upon click-driven and fact devoid media?
Total BS, research it more deeply and dismiss the disinformation at the heart of the article…
Why post Star articles, as they are behind paywall for the majority of us on Reddit.
Even for recorded job interviews. People are taking the seldom changing 6 scenario’s, running the questions through AI and writing out a script or better yet, putting their lap top screen behind the monitor screen they are recording on and making there own teleprompter. Scopes from the in person interviews have gone from the mid 70s to 90s. Work experience, seniority, and the ability to have conversations with employees means nothing yet the employer can’t figure out why the employees are frustrated and absenteeism is on the rise.
Precedence has been set. Every application reviewed by that system now must be a blanket acceptance. Just watch
We need to hold the staff accountable that said they reviewed the AI slop and said it was good. Staff shouldn’t be able to pass their duties onto AI and then blame the AI for mistakes on work that they say they’ve reviewed. If your AI assistant makes a mistake it’s your mistake. Own it.