Nach offiziellen Angaben wird mit dem Zusammenbruch des Regimes im Iran Monate nach dem Krieg gerechnet

https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bk3sgwa5wg

37 Kommentare

  1. Available_Finger_513 on

    Just a few months long special operation here. Nothing to see here.

  2. CanadianGuy39 on

    “At no stage did we think the regime would fall during the war,” the official said. “The assessments were that the regime’s collapse would come several months after the war. No one thought the public could take to the streets while under bombardment.”

    Actually, Trump said that exact thing would happen.

  3. SilveryDeath on

    > The official said the United States has intensified the pace of its strikes against Iran in recent days. He also said Israel assesses that U.S. President Donald Trump is moving toward taking control of Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal, describing such a move as a potential “game changer” that could severely damage the regime’s finances.

    This part is more interesting, since it means the Israelis think Trump is going to do this, which would require putting US boots on the ground.

  4. Even if it was like that, so their plan is to guarantee that the regime will never agree to a ceasefire or what?

  5. Capital-Control308 on

    20 years in Afghanistan, 1 trillion dollars and we learned nothing

  6. pericles123 on

    ‚officials say‘ sounds like some idiot in the current administration

  7. The mechanism for post-war regime collapse matters more than the timeline. Aerial bombardment alone has not produced regime collapse in any modern conflict – Serbia, Iraq, Libya all survived intensive air campaigns. The actual collapse mechanism is: economic stress → elite defection from the regime coalition → institutional fragmentation. That takes time to compound.

    Iran’s specific structure makes this harder than Israeli officials are assuming. The IRGC isn’t just a military force – it’s a parallel economy with construction, logistics, and sanctions-busting revenue streams that give it financial autonomy from the formal state budget. Even if the government goes bankrupt, the IRGC has independent means to pay its own forces. That’s the part that doesn’t collapse on anyone’s 3-month timeline.

    The more significant detail buried in this article is the Kharg Island angle – if the US is genuinely moving toward seizing Iran’s primary oil export terminal (handling ~90% of exports), that’s a fundamentally different operation than an air campaign. It requires holding fixed coastal territory against shore-based anti-ship missiles, Iranian naval harassment, and potentially years of occupation. It also gives the IRGC a rallying point for exactly the kind of nationalist resistance that keeps regimes together longer than intelligence assessments predict. Iraq 2003 planned for 3 months of post-war stabilization. Afghanistan was 20 years. The historical base rate on „months after the war“ is not encouraging.

  8. Simplehoaxes on

    Just like they are expecting a regime collapse in Cuba any day now….. since 1952 lol

  9. Latter-Corner8977 on

    Absolutely embarrassing. Do they think we don’t remember the shit Trump and Hegseth were saying a few weeks ago? Christ even a few days ago?

    “I killed the last leader, I want to pick the new leader😡”

    “I’m mad they didn’t let me pick the new leader 😡”

    “I’m mad they didn’t let me pick the new leader so I’m gonna smash their sandcastle up for fun, because I can  😡”

    Fucking toddler. 

  10. henriqueroberto on

    This is gonna be the new „They’re 2 weeks away from a nuke argument. We’ve been waiting almost 70 years on Cuba and how has that worked out?

  11. For those who were too young to remember the original Iraq war under Bush Senior from 90-91, they said the exact same thing about Saddam Hussein falling after the US left in 1991.

    Saddamn of course stayed in power for over 10 years after, until we went in again and finally occupied Iraq.

    So it could be months, sure…like 144 months. I.e. 12 years. After we invade again, when 120 months have passed.

    And then we could only have to occupy Iran for another… 120 months at least.

  12. LapsedVerneGagKnee on

    Please. The Guardian council will burn the entire Middle East to the ground and render the entire area uninhabitable before ceding power.

  13. slartbangle on

    Is this like one of those things where the monk punches you and you die three days later?

  14. StrangerFew2424 on

    Sure. We’ll just have to wait until after the midterms to see it..

  15. Officials said they obliterated Iran’s nuclear sote. To say otherwise would be fake news.

    Officials said it isn’t a war. To say otherwise would be fake news.

    Officials sending 5,000 marines said there will be no boots on the ground. To say otherwise would be fake news.

    Officials said the war is very complete. To say otherwise would be fake news.

    Officials said Iran used a US missle to strike an Iranian elementary school. To say otherwise would be fake news.

  16. A_Hint_of_Lemon on

    Yeah, but It was probably going to collapse anyway due to the oncoming water crisis, so how did he war help?

  17. You_are_the_Castle on

    I’ll believe it when I see it, but this just seems like some more propaganda.

  18. Laughing…what a great setup so they can pull plug, declare victory in the face of a patently pathetic strategy.

  19. C1andestino on

    Says Ynet News, an Israeli news site 😅 Also, wasn’t it supposed to be within hours of the initial bombardment?

  20. blackmobius on

    Trump said (and expected) the regime to fall as a direct result of the targeted hit. They (the alt right sphere) proudly shouted it, tweeted it, everything.

    Now that they have clearly bit off far more than what they can handle, the try to retroactively reframe what they said

Leave A Reply