Close Menu
    Verschwörung

    Was haltet ihr von Jiang Xianqin?


    Was haltet ihr von Jiang Xianqin?

    Von Ok-Fail2490

    View 27 Comments

    27 Kommentare

    1. DeMakaveli on

      With all due to respect to professor, I feel like he talks more emotionally than rationally on number of occasions.

    4. Attack_Toster on

      I like the Chinese/Canadian version of Peter Zeihan better than the original

    7. CookedChooken on

      Hmmm. Possible demon reptoid ancestry but hard to corroborate without dna sample

    10. NoirRenie on

      I really enjoy his talks on the war and history of countries and learning about game theory. But after seeing he made a video with Sneako, I am wary of the kind of person he is.

    12. Prince_Marf on

      Grifter with lazy slop content. He’s not a real professor he teaches a high school class in China. He has a bunch of weird theories about Nephilim and other gnostic esoteric Christian shit with no substantiation. His youtube channel is basically just him sharing basic high-school level facts and analysis in an interesting way that makes him seem smart. But he also draws a lot of hasty conclusions and assumptions if you’re paying attention.

      I think Vaush did a decent analysis of his content if you have a spare hour and a half: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN9bUUPPRZ8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN9bUUPPRZ8)

    13. Aromatic_Ad_1653 on

      So far his words have been proven right. Watching his lectures is not a waste of time for me

    17. ZANEZAND on

      Right or wrong, he promotes critical thinking(which benefits no country, unless he only posts his stuff outside of china, still, chinese people of a lot of ways to get to his vid) and to question the stuff we’ve been fed and just taken for granted — which is more than most actual uni professors do (and he’s called them out on that, too).

      „only speaking about conspiracies“ is pretty disrespectful to the courses he’s done on youtube alone. He bases a lot of what he says on history and even psychohistory, which sounds obvious but honestly, hardly anyone (even here) does it.

      So yeah, for me he’s pretty legit. You don’t have to agree with everything he says, but you’ll definitely learn a lot and see things from angles you probably hadn’t considered before.

    18. francie-brady on

      For me, everything in YouTube is just entertainment. As long as I’m entertained, that’s okay. I like his lectures and his points of view on the Current events. What else would you want? the truth?! Well, too bad for you, ‚cause it’s too much to ask.

    19. prinkboss on

      Even if he’s a Chinese plant, exposing the truth is far more powerful than any false narrative their government can cook up. His arguments seem reasonable and in good faith

    20. Mr-Wigz on

      I think he’s interesting and intelligent. I’ll watch him sometimes, not too often.

      I remember not even knowing he existed, to the algorithm absolutely pushing everywhere in a rather short period of time.

      I don’t really know what to make of that at this point.

    23. MalwareExe0001 on

      He is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He does not believe in Jesus Christ as Lord. He teaches and believes God lied in the garden in eden when instructing adam and eve about the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. There are other things in the bible he tries to twist as well which you can find out just by listening to his “classes”

      Every “prediction” he’s so called made isn’t a prediction he’s just getting information by his handlers while also copying what the bible says about the end times, yet he doesn’t believe in the full bible he just picks and chooses certain verses to make his “predictions” and analogies seem accurate and truthful when it isn’t.

      He is most likely just another mason or in a satanic secret society like it playing his part working for satan. The world is a stage and everyone who serves satan has a deceptive role to play, he’s certainly playing his.

    25. liberterrorism on

      An entertaining crank who is dead on about a lot of stuff, but has a tendency to go off the deep end.

    26. Nightlower on

      Fun. With some of his theories he fits right into conspiracy territory and he mentioned couple of times to not take him for his word because yeah in the end he’s just guessing and providing his opinion

    27. BleakView on

      He has quite the ability to use game theory to predict future scenarios and he has correctly made multiple predictions using this method.
      He can come off a bit condescending to his students sometimes, but i think this is due to him preferring to speak about systems in a broader scale while his students tend to want answers about specific topics or scenarios instead of trying to look at the systems as a whole and the bigger picture that hes trying to teach them about.
      He seems relatively unbiased despite his Chinese background and I’ve heard him speak negatively about both U.S. and China multiple times so I don’t really see him being a double agent or whatever and more as a really smart individual who has become jaded thru his own knowledge and understanding of power systems.

    Leave A Reply