Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

3 Kommentare
The figure shows, for each year, the prior probability of the exact outcome of all 63 games of that year’s NCAA men’s basketball tournament, using a couple of different models of game outcomes as a function of seeding. Interestingly, last year’s 2025 tournament was, by both models, the second most likely outcome in the history of the current format (2007 being the most likely).
Source data is on [GitHub](https://github.com/possibly-wrong/ncaa-tournament), with links to multiple articles over the years describing methodology in more detail.
I used Mathematica to aggregate the data, compute the probabilities, and create the figure.
It’ll be interesting to see if this trend towards chalk continues this year.
There’s definitely an argument to be made that, with the NIL rules becoming increasingly influential in the last couple years, there’s been more movement of talent from smaller school to the big programs, and that’s [resulted in a bigger gulf between the haves and have-nots](https://www.theringer.com/2026/03/18/college-basketball/march-madness-2026-ncaa-tournament-upsets-cinderella). If this is true, we’ll continue to see a decline in upsets until the system is reigned in.
Do you have a source for what each of the 2 models are