Nvidias DLSS 5 ist ein Schlag ins Gesicht für die Kunst des Videospieldesigns

https://www.ign.com/articles/nvidias-dlss-5-is-a-slap-in-the-face-to-the-art-of-video-game-design

25 Kommentare

  1. yeah, it look bad and soulless, but to be honest i think there will be a lot of people who would like these ‚aesthetic‘ look and would totally go for it. Im sad.

  2. Holy shit even the shill of shills IGN are jumping on the bandwagon. Guess Nvidia didn’t pay for that 7 out of 10 premium coverage…

    Yeah i know broken clocks, twice a day.

  3. Said it in another post, and will say it again: This is the WORST, FAKEST, SCAMMIEST, and Most DISHONEST Fucking „Innovation“ a Graphics card maker has ever introduced to the public in 20 Years

  4. Just like IGN is a slap to the face of journalists

    edit: the astroturfing on this sub is insane, it’s full of sock puppets and bots who throw a conniption fit anytime someone expresses an opinion they don’t agree with

    The truth is, if you’re too insecure to let people voice opinions you don’t agree with that’s your problem

    edit2:

    also internet tough guys who do exactly what they accuse others of lmao

    [https://www.reddit.com/r/sanfrancisco/comments/1rvnl8c/comment/oau4c6h/?context=3](https://www.reddit.com/r/sanfrancisco/comments/1rvnl8c/comment/oau4c6h/?context=3)

  5. The most outrageous thing to me is that AI like this is trained on the hard work and expertise of everyone in an industry, none of whom gave consent, then used to put those same people out of business.

    Of course it’s bad, but it’s going to get “good enough” that studios don’t care if the faces are all flat and the expressions are empty. So long as it allows them to tell shareholders they’re screwing employees over to save on wages they don’t even care if it actually increases profits, because shareholders take it as a given that it will.

  6. The thing that artists and devs endorse? The ones that partnered with Nvidia to bring this to fruition?

    No, the community is a slap in the face of developer and artist autonomy to use the tools they want without getting unreasonable backlash.

    Developers have full control over every pixel that gets delivered to your screen, you don’t get DLSS5 without artist consent.

  7. SceneMassive3564 on

    Nvidia really taking a lot of L’s as of late. Really questioning that choice. I predict a red wave sometime in the near future an I certainly hope is strikes fear into heart of team green.

  8. I was wondering why these dlss5 memes were a thing for the past day or two. After just watching their announcement trailer, all I can say is Jesus Christ was that some horrible AI slop. They not only upscaled what was already there but in many cases invented stuff randomly to make faces look more detail and shiny for some reason. Also I noticed they never showed any long action scenes when applying their filter and for the moment they had a single fast action moment in the soccer section the stupid thing flickered around the eyes when he turned. Got this is trash and I cannot wait for this stupid bubble to burst.

  9. Tiny-Guava-9698 on

    I’m cannot for the life of me explain this to a buddy of mine. He just sees it as something fun and a tool.

  10. GameGuy2025 on

    Developers are the ones implementing DLSS 5. Nvidia didn’t just steal the source code of RE9 and implement DLSS 5 in it for a demo. Capcom’s developers implemented it and this is what the developers wanted to show. This conversation has gotten off the rails.

  11. RottenPingu1 on

    TrasVIDIA for another home run.

    Came here to watch the Elonesque fan boys got to the mat for Jensen.

  12. borgenhaust on

    So what happens when this applies itself to an iconic trademarked character from some major IP holder? What would Disney do to Nvidia if you suddenly have a janky hyper-realistic modified Disney characters in a Disney video game?

  13. redvelvetcake42 on

    It isn’t really even enhancing anything. It’s just… Mid. Like some I’ve seen it’s ok but I haven’t seen it wow me visually ever and for how expensive it’s been to make, that’s unmitigated failure.

  14. It’s… a filter. I don’t like ai art in my games but this? I am finding it hard to care this much about it. This is getting so melodramatic.

  15. PrivateLiker7625 on

    Considering how many developers support this,  they really don’t see this as a slap in the face at all.  Why should it be the case with you lot still?🙄

  16. NoSolution1150 on

    again.

    people have been doing texture/shader mods for years and no one bats and eye

    dlss and everyone loses their minds

    and as nvidia says devs can adjust it too . geez. people need to chill the fuck out

    but if nothing else this just proves how 99.99999 percent of reddit is just regurgitating stuff instead of actually coming up with any new content

  17. Psh, what are we going to do about it? Stop buying stuff? That would be insane. I think I’ll buy a few games in the latest steam sale, preorder nvidias latest gpu, and jerk off on my 128 gb ddr5 ram.

  18. Not sure why there’s all this fuss. You need a 5090 to run this well and the that’s a privilege very few have.

    The rest of us will carry on with the art of video game design.

  19. brandontaylor1 on

    It’s entirely optional, and can be turned off at anytime. You don’t have to use it, the creators don’t have to use it.

    So why have I seen so many god damned posts bitching about it?

Leave A Reply