Close Menu
    Karten

    Stimmen für und gegen den Indian Removal Act im Kongress

    View 18 Comments

    18 Kommentare

    1. Low-Abies-4526 on

      Gosh dang it Cincinnati why do you guys always disappoint the state on every stinkin old map

    2. Mysterious_Rent_613 on

      You can almost see the borders of West Virginia (“no”votes) 30 years before they split from Virginia

    4. Sea_Holiday_7420 on

      I was thinking why would the Indian National Congress be doing that to Indians.

    6. HatesPlanes on

      It’s interesting how people have this perception of green = good, red = bad when it comes to maps.

      By convention yes votes are usually green and nos are usually red, but there is a general aversion to using green for things that are seen as bad because people interpret it as an endorsement.

    7. Juicey_J_Hammerman on

      Weird how all of CT,RI, NJ, and most of MA and upstate NY voted against it but NYC voted for it.

    11. ItThing on

      So what’s the difference between „yes/no“ and „multiple yes/no“? Wikipedia doesn’t give details. Multiple representatives per district, and most districts were split, and some were unanimous, and the unanimous ones are called „multiple“? That can’t be right.

      Anyways, if dark red is indeed a more decisive support than light red – wtf is the deal with Manhattan?

    13. Irish618 on

      Just incase case you’re wondering why theres a North-South divide on something like this, remember that most of the Indian tribes in the north had already been pushed west or wiped out by this point. Southern states still had some, as well as tribes in northern (Spanish) Florida that sometimes raided north into Georgia and Alabama.

    Leave A Reply