Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

11 Kommentare
This is probably enough to force a retrail, tbh. But in itself its not proof that shes innocent and neither is it proof of some conspiracy against her.
Stuff like this being revealed, and yet the Criminal Cases Review Commission still moves at a glacial pace.
I do not know if Letby is guilty or innocent (I merely think the supposed statistical evidence doesn’t match the standard of being beyond reasonable doubt). But I can’t help feeling that the legal system aren’t really interested in guilt or innocence anymore and are more interested in protecting the legal system. I bet there’s more than a few people in positions of legal authority who would rather she die in prison of old age so they don’t have to answer any uncomfortable questions.
I’d assume this is why they have 8 expert witnesses rather than one.
[removed]
The more I read about this case the less certain I am that it’s a safe conviction. The misrepresented statistics and notes are so condemning in themselves, two of the biggest miscarriages of justice in Europe judicial history are for two other Neonatal nurses.
Proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt. There are enough questions there that should be looked into.
Even if she was found not guilty by a fair trial, no way is anybody going to trust a baby with her.
Lucy Letby is guilty. People need to stop letting Netflix doc convince them otherwise.
In the US you can seek a retrial (won’t necessarily be granted) if there failings in the way the defendant was represented. I don’t that’s possible here but there’s a compelling argument for that being the case here
He wasn’t found guilty of any wrongdoing. But a judge needs to decide if this is enough for a retrial.
She did it but it’s a massively unsafe conviction and she should be set free. Shameful really
The more you look at this case the more you see the huge faults with the prosecution. We need to know ultimately whether she committed this crime or not, and we’re never going to know if we can’t have confidence in the justice system. What an absolute shambles.