Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

9 Kommentare
**Dozens of hereditary peers are set to lose their seats in the House of Lords, after the passage of a bill that will end a parliamentary role dating back hundreds of years.**
Peers passed the House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill after ministers offered a compromise to end a long-running dispute with opponents of the reform.
The majority of hereditary peers, who inherit their titles through their families, were abolished in 1999 under the last Labour government and this bill abolishes the last remaining 92.
Lords Leader Baroness Smith said the „historic legislation“ realised Labour’s manifesto pledge to remove the right of all hereditary peers to sit and vote in the upper house.
„This has never been about the contribution of individuals but the underlying principle that was agreed by Parliament over 25 years ago that no-one should sit in our Parliament by way of an inherited title,“ Baroness Smith said.
„Over a quarter of a century later, hereditary peers remain whilst meaningful reform has stagnated.
„We have a duty to find a way forward.“
Baroness Smith confirmed the government would offer life peerages to some of the Conservatives and crossbenchers who would otherwise lose their seats.
As a result, the Conservatives withdrew their opposition to the bill.
Up to 92 hereditary peers will leave the Lords when the current session of Parliament ends, which is expected to be in May.
The Conservative leader in the Lords, Lord True, said he accepted the government’s mandate to end hereditary membership of the upper house.
Confirming the Tories would no longer fight the bill, he said he had always believed there was a need to dial down „eternal [parliamentary] ping-pong“ even though the compromise would be a bitter pill for some on his side to swallow.
In another compromise, the government also plans to increase the number of paid ministers in the Lords – some have worked without a salary due to restrictions in the current law.
One of the departing hereditaries, the Earl of Devon, said the bill was regrettable.
He said his family had been in the Lords for 900 years and complained the notice period was less than required in employment law.
„I think the public will miss us,“ the Earl of Devon said.
He added: „We should be proud to sit here as embodiments of the hereditary principle dating back a millennium.“
Baroness Smith said interim measures had been in place for 25 years since the first hereditaries were removed under Tony Blair’s government in the 1990s.
Ministers are looking at further reforms with a possible retirement age and minimum participation rates.
The bill is now set to become law.
Are they going to remove all the people Boris sold peerages to? Feel that’s the biggest issue considering one of them is the son of an ex KGB agent…
I think the earl of Devon may be mistaken about people missing „doesn’t Google Earl of Devon“
personally I’d like to see the house of lords become a thing of the past.
Great, so now rather than a bunch of inheritors who are theoretically free of electoral pressure being able to look at an issue objectively (okay, the ‚theoretically is doing a lot of hard work here) we now get a smorgasbord of „yes you dodged paying taxes, and yes you may have done questionable things for corporations/foreign nations in office, but here, have a lifetime peerage and carry on!“
Good. Doesn’t solve all the Lord’s problems but it’s a step.
i am off to the shops tomorrow morning to buy some bubbles to celebrate.
I’m honestly sad to see them go, as most of the remainder were decent and not politicians. It doesn’t address the central issue of the power of the PM to appoint at will, even if I think election would be a worse choice.
The house of lords should just be made of people who are genuine experts in their field who have academically published world recognised research in their field in the last 5yrs before application.