KI-CEOs befürchten, dass die Regierung KI verstaatlichen wird

Just days ago, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said „It has seemed to me for a long time it might be better if building artificial general intelligence were a government project.“ And Palantir’s CEO thinks it’s inevitable – that if a technology takes millions of jobs *and* threatens the U.S. military, that you’d be crazy to think it *wouldn’t* get nationalized.

Do AI companies secretly want this? Imagine guaranteed government contracts and guaranteed funding for research and development. Or will government inevitably *need* this? If society is transformed, will they have no choice but to seize the private companies building it so they can direct its development?

Oh well. Maybe you shouldn’t have been in bed with this admin.

They don’t worry. It was always the plan. AI can be used as a mass surveillance tool and most AI shops are impossible to make profitable.

Nationalization disguised as a bail out was always the goal.

It’s not high tech enough. The moat is currently just language and training. What’s a government going to do about open source models? Maaaaaybe if the government banned individual hardware ownership they could do it, but i don’t see the public accepting that. This is just more evidence that Altman and Co don’t really have a clue about what they are doing.

Anyway I’m off to the thrift store to buy every single book they’ve got.

It shouldn’t be nationalized.

It should be banned.

(Anyway, all corporations and rich people, and us too, are nationalized already right now. This criminal regime can do anything at any time and nothing except the implicit threat of armed rebellion and mass resistance- whether or not we are any longer capable of actually effecting that kind of fight for our liberty- is able to stop them. If the DOJ rolled up to Anthropic or OpenAI or even JP Morgan, and said, ‘pay us, or else,’ they’d pay, or they’d be destroyed. Nazism makes no compromises, capitalism is only useful to Nazis as long as it is useful, or it will be destroyed. You get, what you campaign financed, you Silicon Valley apocalypse incel cult of dunces)

Well, they are presently making the mistake of trying to move too far too fast. And doing that will generate a significant back reaction against it.

I think the bigger risk to profiteers is that AI models look to be democratized too easily. A decently funded government project can release an open source model for a tenth the price at 90% the capability.

I was listening to a podcast that spoke about how the race for AGI is essentially the race for total power.

If anyone creates genuine AGI – it would instantly be able to control the world’s nuclear arsenal. It would break encryption that was unbreakable. It would game economic models and connected systems in a way that we likely couldn’t comprehend.

It’s hard to even imagine something that has the power to be world shifting. In weird way it’s like the old adage – “Imagine trying to explain cars to horse traders.”

If AGI is possible, it will be so beyond comprehension that even our most residents safe systems will be at the threat of complete destruction.

I think what we likely end up with is a lot of very useful specific “agents” that are perfect for operating within specific tasks.

The ability to connect all those tasks and adjust for the nuances of the weird contextual clues that we all use in our daily lives will be difficult.

This isn’t a “what word most commonly follows this word if the following parameters and probabilities are true for the words before it.” Problem.

I just hope we don’t completely destroy the next 10-15 years with this shit. Technology is fire. Fire can be a great thing and we’ve learned how to use it to better our lives. It STILL burns a ton of shit down accidentally though.

Is not that reliable nor accurate, so it will fit perfectly with other government assets.

No shit, you’ve built the best automated surveillance and de-anonymizing system in history.

That would be hilarious at first and then absolutely terrifing

I mean, surely this is the way forward? I’ve been shouting from the rooftops at work about something similar. We’re pissing around trying to implement AI in different ways. Every day someone has something new to trial. Nothing sticks. All the while we’re burning tokens like mad. All people are doing is vibe coding.

Anyway, at some point, some key workflows using AI will stick and we’ll be bound by some models. At some point the VC funding will cease and the rug will be pulled. Then all the companies reliant on these LLMs will have their costs increase massively (potentially). So why not invest in open source or inner source now? Isn’t that the smart move? Then keep some funding for some premium models.

I mean, anyone doing OpenClaw stuff is going that straight off the bat… so why are massive companies not? I mean we all know why.

So by scaling this up and having this at government level, surely that makes sense. Fuck em. They would fuck you over in a heartbeat. To be at the behest of a load of tech bros who were all sexually repressed teenagers is madness!