Seit Beginn des Jahres sehen wir mehrere Veröffentlichungen darüber, wie China die Lücke zu den USA in der KI schließt. Ich halte das für eine Farce, insbesondere bei KI-Waffen. Ich habe es im beigefügten Artikel besser erklärt, aber ich werde einen TLDR hinzufügen …
Die gesamte Verteidigungsstrategie Irans basierte auf einer Annahme: dass jeder Angreifer Zeit brauchen würde. Gehärtete Anlagen, verschüttete Nuklearstandorte, Führung, die nach unregelmäßigen Zeitplänen agierte. Das Fenster war die Verteidigung.
es schloss an einem einzigen Morgen. am 28. Februar, als die USA und Israel in den ersten 12 Stunden 900 Angriffe starteten – ein Tempo, das in jedem Konflikt vor diesem Jahrzehnt Wochen gedauert hätte. KI, die Drohnen-Feeds, Satellitenbilder und Telekommunikationsaufzeichnungen gleichzeitig über jede Zielkategorie hinweg zusammenführt, nicht nacheinander, wie es menschliches Personal kann.
China ist das einzige Land, das ernsthaft versucht, die Lücke zu schließen. DeepSeek hat bewiesen, dass sie leistungsfähige Modelle mit weniger Rechenaufwand erstellen können. Die PLA-Beschaffung nimmt seit Jahren Fahrt auf. aber die PLA hat seit 1979 keinen Krieg mehr geführt. Die USA haben diese Systeme während Live-Konflikten betrieben und echte Schlachtfelddaten in sie eingespeist. Das ist nichts, was man aus einem Beschaffungsdokument reproduzieren kann.
Und günstigere Modelle sind nie ein Graben. Dahinter steckt die jahrelange kampferprobte Infrastruktur.
Was denken Sie?
https://nanonets.com/blog/ai-warfare-operation-epic-fury-2026/
11 Kommentare
Sure, China has DeepSeek, accelerating procurement, and zero ethical debates slowing them down (like Anthropic for Pentagon.) But they haven’t fought a war since 1979. Does real combat experience compound faster than anyone can catch up?
Yeah it’s so cool how we can be murdered by machines now as well as people
Iran does not have AI but it still launched over 1000 missiles and a few thousand drones.
They’re not that far behind in AI and quite ahead of America in robotics tho
Why would this have needed AI? Isn’t this the “shock and awe” doctrine from 20 years ago? That was a development from Blitzkrieg in 1939. I seem to remember a lot happening on the first day of Iraq War.
You don’t need AI to schedule 900 attacks in a day. Just lots of planning, logistics and people.
The most disturbing thing is that the accuracy of these systems hasn’t been mentioned. AI accuracy is notoriously unreliable, as I sure we have all experienced. It’s not like the US has cared about this in the past, as examples like drone striking wedding parties show, but Israel’s recent examples with bombing targets chosen by AI with basically no human oversight should worry us all. They say there is “always a human involved” in targeting, but in practice it’s a guy slamming the bomb button on anything the AI suggests.
I agree USA is top by far. But also US or Israel bombed a school killing children (or at least evidence seems to be more in favor of that happening and not a lie).
Maybe that targeting was AI hallucination.
Also unless they can use AI to do heavy propaganda to turn population in favor of US, even if you can attack every else perfectly, this will turn into another Afghanistan or worse another Vietnam wars for US.
They ‚proved‘ this by launching missiles faster than ever before? Like the one that killed 160 little girls sitting in school?
The US is the undisputed leader in having overconfidence in its technology, and that has deadly and disastrous consequences.
Tell me you’re too young to remember the Iraq war without telling me you’re too young.
The US has overwhelming military strength. While I’m sure AI was used for target identification (yay AI only decided one school full of children was a target) there wasn’t much difference between this attack and the opening salvo of the Iraq war where in just days the US had completely dismantled the ground forces of one of the largest armies in the world at the time.
The issue is the lack of Actual Intelligence in the humans, it doesn’t matter if you have the greatest AI capabilities in the universe if the people making the decisions are idiots.
You didn’t see any evidence of AI being dominant and then made this post.
You also have a very surface level understanding of Chinese AI based on DeepSeek. This is a gross misunderstanding.
Final thing I will say: we bombed a “fighter jet on a tarmac” that turned out to be a painted outline designed specifically to fool AI targeting.
Yup, super dominant.
As someone who works in tech and with family and ties to Taiwan and China along with an understanding of both American and East Asian (Chinese broadly speaking) culture I’m not surprised at all.
First off, China’s culture values the idea of ‚harmony‘ and getting along much more than individualism. The CCP has made itself the larger arbiter of those values. Even in temples and religious sites dedicated to ancestors, the predominant motivator in traditional Chinese culture has added lines today making sure the message is clear. „The country (the CCP) above family“.
Why this matters?
Go ahead and imagine trying to get ahead, to innovate and move forward when this is the primary moral value in society.
Coming up with innovative strategies, new technologies and more always relies on outliers, people who break rules and are willing to fail.
Let me put it simply: You know in the US how you might have that asshole boss who is the owner’s son? But because he’s never had to work on the floor of the warehouse, or risked injury working with machinery, he’s kind of clueless and needs to base his authority on something other than merit?
Yea, that’s how a lot of modern Chinese militaries are structured, which, by the way, is in EVERYTHING.
You literally need a CCP member on every board of every company. Mandated by the govt. So imagine a third generation son of a son who never saw war, never has been shot at, barely ever struggled or started a company etc. making the calls or at least influencing them based on rules and legalism beyond reason. The status quo becomes incredibly hard to break or challenge.
What a lot of western people imagine with China is the merit system, the testing that was the backbone of Chinese innovation. The idea was to sidestep this idea of nepotism that can degrade a system through poor beauricratic leadership through rigourous tests to insure the best and the brightest would lead or be rewarded. Incredibly difficult, and impossible to sustain it fell apart when the CCP took over.
As a result, there is a reason that despite being the controlling manufacturer on the PLANET China hasn’t come up or released any groundbreaking products or ideas. Have they improved on ones that existed? Absolutely, but that’s different skillset and mindset. It’s engineering prowess, not creative genius.
The US took the car from Benz and made it affordable through the assembly line. We revolutionized the world by not only inventing aircraft, but created, not stole, created a manufacturing industry around it.
Radios, televisions, transitors, computers, the internet and of course, the atomic bomb. All by the US in just over 100 years.
Other countries you NEED to know someone. To be from the right families to even get in the door. In the US we largely care about the idea. Steve Jobs, for example, was adopted. Bezos was raised by a single mother, a Cuban refugee and a largely middle class background.
Now look at the UK. Their Prince (both of them) are a joke. Andrew is an arrogant child molester, Charles‘ had a failed marriage to one of the most influential royals in generations. Which is what his job is, to influence opinion. He failed at one of the biggest opportunities for that in his family history, to bridge the modern and the past, and he failed for what?He traded his legacy, his countries status and image on a global and historical stage, for his own happiness in the for Camilla? Sigh. No offense but she isn’t exactly Helen of Troy, which is also a story about the destruction of a civilization for a piece of ass.
Look at China, Xi is ‚President‘ because of his dad.
That happens in the US too, but they don’t have a lifetime of power because of it. George W. Bush is now famous for his paintings despite formerly being a twice elected president.
At the end of the day, Americans care about results, not family lineage nearly as much. In China, it’s a lot more about clout chasing. There is a lot more bullshit to deal with.