KI ist nicht als Bösewicht angekommen, sondern als Spiegel, der genau widerspiegelt, wie mechanisch unser Leben geworden ist. Die Tragödie liegt nicht darin, dass Maschinen immer intelligenter werden; Es liegt daran, dass wir unintelligent gelebt haben, und jetzt wird diese Tatsache ans Licht gebracht.
4 Kommentare
The global discourse on the future of technology often fixates on external risks, yet the true crisis lies in the widening gap between our intellectual power and our internal maturity.
Technology is a „magnificent servant“ when guided by a clear, conscious mind, but it becomes a „dangerous master“ when it merely amplifies our existing, raw animalistic instincts for survival and possession.
If our fundamental institutions—educational, political, and economic—are already „brimming with sickness“ rooted in fear, greed, and competitiveness, then simply automating these systems with AI will only scale that dysfunction globally. We are currently living as „characters“ playing out traditional roles and evolutionary scripts rather than conscious individuals.
True recovery and a sustainable future depend on closing this „evolutionary gap“ by cultivating internal wisdom (Vivek) so that our inner development matches the scale of our external power. Without this, we risk becoming „inwardly stunted“ versions of human possibility while our machines do the living for us.
About Author
Source:https://acharyaprashant.org/media
Yes, this is true, we were already machines, but now we will become completely machines and in the future we will become dependent only on machines.
AI isn’t a problem. It’s what people are wanting to do with it. As usual Billionaires are wanting to Billionaire. They want control and to take from yours and my families for their own benefit.
I mean, despite all their data LLMs are still way behind in a really important aspect of the human mind and that is theorising something. They can find everything relevant in the given context in many different languages, but they can’t produce something new from it.
Yes, LLMs look like theirs is imagination too, in a similar fashion to the human mind, but they can’t think outside of the box. Always in certain boundaries, where they need to copy the context from mainstream media. If you come up with Scenario A, but ask for a situation of Scenario B, the context shigts entirely into a mixture of both and that’s it. No enrichment at all.
Human mind doesn’t act like that, because we tend to fuse individual real life experiences into our thinking.
And I don’t have a mechanical life despite all of its blandness from the outside. So it doesn’t reflect me.