In Bezug auf Taiwan und Japan geht die chinesische Kriegslust nach hinten los

# **Public Statement on China’s Unlawful Aggression Toward Japan’s Peaceful and Legal Actions**

A clarification is required regarding China’s recent escalation against Japan—a campaign marked by diplomatic hostility, violent rhetoric, and coordinated information warfare targeting a nation that has acted entirely within international law.

—

## **1. Japan Has Acted With Restraint and Legal Precision**

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s remarks regarding a Taiwan contingency were a straightforward articulation of Japan’s **legal obligations** under its own security framework.
A foreign attack on Taiwan would create a “survival-threatening situation” for Japan—this is geography, law, and reality.

Japan threatened no action.
Japan initiated no escalation.
Japan acted transparently and within the bounds of the U.N. Charter.

—

## **2. China Responded With Criminal Threats and Norm-Breaking Conduct**

China escalated the situation in unprecedented fashion:

– The Chinese Consul General in Osaka publicly endorsed **beheading** Japan’s Prime Minister.
– This was not metaphorical—it was a **violent threat made by an accredited diplomat** on foreign soil.

This conduct violates:
– The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
– International norms governing peaceful dispute resolution
– Basic diplomatic and human standards

This was not “miscommunication.”
It was *coercive diplomacy*.

—

## **3. China Then Manipulated the U.N. To Cast Japan as the Aggressor**

China’s subsequent U.N. complaint portrayed Japan’s defensive legal statement as “armed intervention.”
This is a false accusation designed to shift blame and manufacture international legitimacy for Beijing’s aggressive posture.

Japan’s comments were:
– Defensive
– Legal
– Non-escalatory

China’s narrative is the inverse of reality.

—

## **4. Chinese Social Media Amplifies Nuclear War Rhetoric**

State-aligned platforms in China are now saturated with:
– Nuclear threats toward Japan
– Calls for war
– Nationalist incitement targeting the Japanese public

These narratives are cultivated—not organic.

—

## **5. Japan’s Nuclear Review Is a Rational and Legal Response**

Japan is surrounded by three nuclear-armed authoritarian states:
– China
– Russia
– North Korea (which receives illegal assistance from China, including missile development and activities at Sinpo Shipyard)

In this context, Japan’s reconsideration of its nuclear principles is:
– Legally justified
– Strategically necessary
– A sovereign right under international law

Japan is entitled to **the same deterrence options as any state facing nuclear coercion.**

—

## **6. The Real Threat to Peace Comes From Beijing, Not Tokyo**

Japan has acted with:
– Restraint
– Legal clarity
– Transparency
– Commitment to stability and alliance frameworks

China has responded with:
– Violent threats
– Disinformation
– Diplomatic escalation at the U.N.
– Military intimidation
– Support for DPRK proliferation
– State-amplified nationalist aggression

The contrast is unambiguous.

—

## **7. The International Community Must Reject Authoritarian Coercion**

Beijing’s actions represent a broader pattern of authoritarian states attempting to:
– Redefine defensive measures as “provocation”
– Weaponize international institutions
– Silence democratic nations through intimidation
– Manufacture narratives that justify future aggression

Japan is exercising its right to self-defense.
China is exercising its desire to dominate.

This distinction matters, and the world must say so clearly.

—