tldr; Haseeb Qureshi of Dragonfly argues that crypto’s deterministic design is better suited for AI agents rather than humans. He highlights the mismatch between blockchain’s rigid architecture and human behavior, noting that crypto-native firms still rely on traditional legal systems. Qureshi suggests AI agents could seamlessly interact with crypto, leveraging its automated and immutable features. He envisions a future where AI-driven wallets and machine-to-machine economies dominate, though human oversight and legal systems will remain relevant.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
liquid_at on
has the swift system been made for humans?
AgitatedDragonfly769 on
It was designed for degens like us
3DanO1 on
Great. When the robots take over, at least I’ll have some robot-money to bribe them to not harvest my family
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
4 Kommentare
tldr; Haseeb Qureshi of Dragonfly argues that crypto’s deterministic design is better suited for AI agents rather than humans. He highlights the mismatch between blockchain’s rigid architecture and human behavior, noting that crypto-native firms still rely on traditional legal systems. Qureshi suggests AI agents could seamlessly interact with crypto, leveraging its automated and immutable features. He envisions a future where AI-driven wallets and machine-to-machine economies dominate, though human oversight and legal systems will remain relevant.
*This summary is auto generated by a bot and not meant to replace reading the original article. As always, DYOR.
has the swift system been made for humans?
It was designed for degens like us
Great. When the robots take over, at least I’ll have some robot-money to bribe them to not harvest my family