Hetzige Behauptungen über die Identität des Tumbler-Ridge-Schützen nehmen zu, da gewählter Beamter „Trans-Gewalt“ behauptet

I see this as similar to the Lapu-Lapu mass murder, of similar scale, and less than a year ago. In that case it was another severely mentally ill young person, who had been under several mental health holds, and should not have had access to lethal machinery. In that case it was a large SUV, not a firearm.

IMHO both gun regs and gender issues are mostly beside the point. In both cases, to any sensible person there was a clear danger to the public. Yet the system inexplicably let them continue to have access to car keys / firearms.

In the lapu-lapu case, I debated people in the mental health system at the time who appeared to believe that the right to drive should *never* be taken away as long as someone was free, that doing so was so much an affront to dignity and incentivizing good behavior, that a mental health hold would occur first anyway. It’s very difficult to explain the fact the family’s petition to return their firearms succeeded.