Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

8 Kommentare
3 years does not equal „just see“ imo
That „could“ is doing a lot of work with a theory aluded to by a single non-reproducible result. I think I’ll wait for at least a second measurement before throwing too much weight behind this idea.
„it could explain (almost) everything“ is a novel variation on the usual click bait headline.
It could even explain why we have a president who covers up a pedophile ring
For those who haven’t made it through the article: It’s not at all about any observations of exploding black holes.
In 2023 a high-energy neutrino was observed, so high-energy, in fact, that we have no current explanation for it.
The researchers interviewed in this article propose a hypothesis that primordial black holes should be evaporating, and at a mass that can no longer maintain an event horizon would then „explode“ back into regular space-time along with a plethora of elementary particles, including these high-energy neutrinos.
Astronomer here! Take a huge grain of salt here. This is based on a single neutrino detection by one neutrino detector. For those who don’t know, neutrinos are fundamental particles, like how an electron is a fundamental particle, except they have no charge and virtually no mass. Neutrinos are very cool but neutrino physics is *hard* to do right, and the first people to tell you “don’t obsess too much about single cases we don’t understand” are those who do it. You can usually tell what is an *actual* result based on if the neutrino detector’s collaboration is on the paper- for this one they are not.
So this is a single weird neutrino was spotted and the group came up with a complicated theory to explain it. Ok, good for them. Doesn’t mean it’s correct or real, and skepticism is warranted.
Reminds me of the time CERN sent a particle backwards through time. Oops nope it was a sensor malfunction
That explains why I had diarrhea this morning 🤔