FAA unterstützt Trumps Angriffe auf Kanada wegen Flugzeugzulassungen

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-02/faa-backs-trump-s-attacks-on-canada-over-airplane-certifications?embedded-checkout=true

    36 Kommentare

    1. Wait, you are telling me the Government Organization probably now stacked with a bunch of Trump loving Sycophants would back the verbal diarrhea coming out of the orange pantshitters gob?

      *Crazy talk.*

      [Paywall bypass here as well.](https://archive.ph/Jg9Ie)

    2. insatiableliberalass on

      Why is reciprocating being framed as an „attack“ aside from the obvious reason to intentionally shape and distort peoples opinions on the matter?

      There is no reason for either the USA or Canada to not allow the others planes, they both obviously make planes that work, however Canada wants to protect its own while not allowing the US the do the same, thats not going to „fly“ any more.

    3. Dense-Perspective on

      Lower all standards, let the companies tell you they comply, world will be a better place.

      LOL

    4. The_King_of_Canada on

      Don’t most rich people fly in planes made in Canada? And aren’t a lot of the fleets in the US made up of Canadian made planes?

      Are they destroying aviation? Again?

    5. T4whereareyou on

      I am sure they will. Who do we think is running the American government these days. Only problem will be during forest fire season when the Canadian built water bomber fleet can’t fly.

    6. Impressive-Brush-837 on

      Is that the same FAA that accepted Boeings certification for the 737 Max that killed a crap ton of people?

    7. PowermanFriendship on

      LOL the certification process is literally already happening. This is just Trump being a little bitch, he’s demanding something that’s already happening so that when it’s complete, he can deem Canada conquered due to his tough guy bullshit. This guy is the biggest man-baby ever.

    8. wrenchedups on

      FAA is deferring part of the certification process to a politician’s executive order.

      ICAO will be interested in that.

    9. Canada should not be bullied into rubber-stamping US planes. Part of the price of massive deregulation is that other countries don’t trust your certifications and must take the time to verify them independently.

      This isn’t about safety; it is about pressure. If the Americans want to take yet another shot at Canadian businesses, they are at liberty to do so. The government’s responsibility to make sure Canadian skies are as safe as possible remains unchanged.

    10. The FAA is not an independent agency; it’s part of the Department of Transportation. They’re not „backing“ Trump’s attacks; they’re doing what their boss is telling them to do.

    11. Exact_Maintenance496 on

      Come, you could get Canada in few days, but be ready to live in Hells by the resistances. I hope the military won’t listening their tangerine potus pedophile. Otherwise , we are many to resist and we don’t care to die, but many of US will come with us in the other side !

    12. Of course they do. They think that if they waiver some tests that it should be good enough for everyone, whether or not they are directly relevant to cold climates where Canada lives.

    13. All you need to know from this article:

      >The FAA certified Gulfstream’s newest models, the G700 and G800, in 2025. They have not been certified in Canada because of pending tests on a crucial fuel icing system, but Canadian Industry Minister Melanie Joly said Friday that the certification process was “well under way.”

      >In the US, the FAA gave Gulfstream an exemption on the G700 and G800 until the end of 2026, allowing the planemaker to deliver the model even as tests are done to ensure the fuel system is safe from tiny droplets of water freezing and blocking flow of fuel to the engines.

      Clearly we are appling an appropriate amount of rigor, and there is certainly an argument the FAA is not.

    14. if FAA is putting partisan politics over safety then all of their certifications are in doubt

      all the more reason for Canada to do our own certification instead of trusting whatever the FAA has to say

    15. BlueInfinity2021 on

      From the article:

      >The FAA certified Gulfstream’s newest models, the G700 and G800, in 2025. They have not been certified in Canada because of pending tests on a crucial fuel icing system, but Canadian Industry Minister Melanie Joly said Friday that the certification process was [“well under way.”](https://archive.ph/o/Jg9Ie/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-30/canada-minister-says-gulfstream-certification-is-well-underway)

      >In the US, the FAA gave Gulfstream an exemption on the G700 and G800 until the end of 2026, allowing the planemaker to deliver the model even as tests are done to ensure the fuel system is safe from tiny droplets of water freezing and blocking flow of fuel to the engines.

      Why should we have to give an exemption from certain tests just so that the aircraft can be delivered quicker?

      Why is the FAA even allowing something like that?

    16. DrFarfetsch on

      Somehow I feel that following the orders of a child raping human trafficker undermining national security isn’t the most intelligent move, but hey, intelligence isn’t the strong point of these pedos.

    17. Familiars_ghost on

      Go for it. People should find out the hard way sometimes that most of the airdrop firefighting planes are Canadian made. That should do wonders in the drought stricken west this year. /s

      Morons.

    18. mikeEliase30 on

      You can « expect » in one hand and piss in the other and see which FAA hand gets full first.

    19. TheShade247 on

      He doesn’t lose arguments.. he just abandons them mid-sentence and starts beef with nouns.

    20. „The US Federal Aviation Administration said it expects other countries‘ aviation authorities to accept its certifications, as President Donald Trump threatens Canada over certification of Gulfstream jets.

      „Our concern is whether or not sufficient resources are being applied to US products equal to the resources that we’re applying to certify foreign products,“ FAA administrator Bryan Bedford said on the sidelines of the Changi Aviation Summit on Monday in Singapore. „So we just want a level playing field.“

    21. reggiemcsprinkles on

      That article really doesn’t say what the author wants it to say or what a lot of readers want it to say.

      The FAA representative NEVER says that the G7 or G8 should be certified in Canada, just that they expect reciprocity when they certify an aircraft.

      He is being very careful in his wording to not offend his boss or distort and politicize the actual process of certification of an aircraft.

      And, when the FAA finally officially certifies the G7 and G8, Canada will do the same. Trump can kick rocks.

    22. From the article,

      “Bedford said that when the FAA certifies an aircraft, it expects other agencies to accept the certification.

      “They normally do a validation program and those things shouldn’t take five, six, and seven years,” he said.

      The FAA certified Gulfstream’s newest models, the G700 and G800, in 2025. They have not been certified in Canada because of pending tests on a crucial fuel icing system, but Canadian Industry Minister Melanie Joly said Friday that the certification process was “well under way.”

      In the US, the FAA gave Gulfstream an exemption on the G700 and G800 until the end of 2026, allowing the planemaker to deliver the model even as tests are done to ensure the fuel system is safe from tiny droplets of water freezing and blocking flow of fuel to the engines.”

      I think, in Canada, we take icing more seriously!

    23. blonde_discus on

      In all fairness, this does seem like a way to potentially reduce the number of billionaires in the world.

    24. frankenmeister on

      It would hurt but the US pilots could have a general strike to protest making their lives and the lives of their passengers less safe.

    25. rawrpwnsaur on

      So what’s the endgame here? Expediting certification so a jet crashes and kills a bunch of rich people? Like OK. Its really the CEO/Billionaire class that’s in these things the majority of the time anyway.

    26. I hope they go ahead and do it.

      This will ground a lot of planes that serve domestic and international destinations. This will hurt U.S. based airlines and consumers.

      Lots of cancelled flight services means less available choices to consumers, which will inflate prices across the board.

      Another way Trump is making everything „less expensive“

    27. IneptusAstartes on

      Do everything the dictator wants or lose your job to another syc*phant. (wait why is that last word marked as „uncivil or hateful“…)

    28. Beaverdamn328 on

      All federal institutions and organizations in the US are now packed with Trump sycophants. This is why he and Musk purged so many people in the first couple months.

      I’ve actually seen it first hand recently while working with American public servants. Those that remain are either afraid to speak up because they risk losing their jobs, or they’ve fully chugged the koolaid. It really is shocking when you talk to some of these people for the first time. It’s like they live in a different reality, despite having very important jobs. I had one tell me that there’s a lot of „left-wing nonsense“ in the media regarding Trump’s foreign policy on Canada.

      I should mention that I’ve also met a small number of incredibly brave American public servants who still voice their opposition in quiet ways. The importance of these people can not be understated. They will be vital if we can ever hope to see a return to „normal“ for our southern neighbor.

    29. Keystone-12 on

      To be clear.

      **The Gulfstreams have not passed fuel icing tests yet**.

      The USA has just given them a *provisional* approval, awaiting these tests.

      Obviously Canada isnt going to do that…. fuel icing is a bit of a problem in a lot of our cities.

      There is absolutely no way, Canada can approve these planes without this test.

    30. Why do we care about what the FAA says? They’re a US controlled administration. Likely bought and paid for like all the others in the US now.
      We are not the US, we do not care.

    31. Leajane1980 on

      Trump is mad at Bad Bunny and I believe I read that Air India has grounded a Boeing made plane for safety reasons?

    32. Worldgonecrazylately on

      The FAA, who allowed Boeing to self certify their planes, which are falling out of the skies because they didn’t do thier job and cut corners to increase profits, are critisizing another gov’t for being thurough about making sure their planes are safe. Kinda rich, no?

    33. thebossphoenix on

      Safety was pretty relaxed at Chernobyl too, what’s the worst that could happen?

    Leave A Reply