Die absoluten Zahlen habe ich vor ein paar Tagen gepostet: Koalitionsopfer in Afghanistan.
Viele Leute haben nach einer Pro-Kopf-Ansicht gefragt – hier ist sie.
Ich habe verwendet Todesfälle statt Verluste für Präzision.
Keine Legende enthalten; Die Flags sollten selbsterklärend sein.
Von chartedtv
10 Kommentare
This might be a stupid complaint but wouldn’t it make sense to, instead of a per-capita chart, doing a per-soldier sent chart? Anyway you graph looks pretty.
“we invaded a country and it made our soldiers sad” – graph version
For those confused as to why it appears the UK is on there twice: the first line actually represents Georgia, not the UK. The way the flag is cropped into these circles makes it hard to tell at a glance.
Oh look, our good friend Denmark lost a larger part of their population avenging an attack on the United States. So yes anyway let’s threaten to invade them so we can secure land we already have uninhibited military access to.
What’s the deal with Denmark? Why are they always so eager to follow USA into wars that are not theirs?
should make per solider sent chart then we can make a ranking of who has the best trained soldiers
The British army paying a blood price for MOD pennypinching
I don’t mean to be offensive or ignorant, but I didn’t even know Georgian forces were there. Why are the fatalities so high for them? (Besides having a small population)
A bit random stat as population has nothing to do with how many soldiers different countries had there. More interesting it would be to see deaths per soldiers sent to Afghanistan
now control for American friendly fire.