Warum Frankreich gerade Teams und Zoom zugunsten selbst entwickelter Videokonferenzen aufgegeben hat

It’s probably not practical but countries should go out of their way to rely on the US as little as possible. We have proven we aren’t reliable and won’t be for the foreseeable future even after the current fascist administration is gone. It’s a shame.

Anything is better than Microslop Teams. I wish our company would do something similar… It always bugs out and stops working for no reason.

Isn’t it abundantly clear? The hell is this article written for

First off, love the move to get away from companies like Microsoft and Zoom, even as an American. But, Visio? Did you really have to name it after another Microsoft Product? 🤣

Well, its just security. US Big Tech many times confirmed they will obey any demand from US government related to EU citizens. There is simply no guarantee that US government will not demand confidential data and it will be given on silver plate.

Well, thats good thing. VISA&Mastercard will be also done in EU before 2030.

Are there government agencies that just chug out useful software with no profit incentive? Similar to how the US has the NIH that does biomedical research.

The question is why did France (and other EU members) wait so long?

Hope other EU countries will follow soon with broad range of European software products.

Nothing makes America great again like losing the world’s trust, trade, assistance.. Hey guys I don’t think we’re recovering from his one.

Makes sense for a government to not have its data and exchanges subject to the US Cloud Act that would allow US agencies to access it.

The French running away from something? Shocker.

Nations should be actively sponsoring open source solutions for ALL common tasks and file formats.

The fact that so many companies rely on software that is also increasingly cloud-dependent, talking to the company via the internet, requiring subscriptions in perpetuity, and generally allowing for the rug to be pulled our from under any company or country that is too reliant on them is a HUGE security liability.

There is no reason why France or Myanmar or any and every other country couldn’t choose to sponsor open source contributions, maintenance or even forking and development of GOOD tools that keep MS Office, or Adobe stuff, or Autodesk stuff, etc. from being single-source solutions.

I am an Architect and my entire industry is practically wholly dependent on Autodesk to supply (I mean „supply“ meaning rent) software to the whole damn construction industry. Even outside of „national security“ issues, just the sheer amount of money that firms sink into a pretty transparently rent-seeking company is comical. I mean, literally, my very typical software suite costs about $5,000 to maintain licensed every year. This is mostly for software that hasn’t been seriously revised in at least 15 years.

It always felt like the national architect’s association, the AIA, and maybe some of the other major countries‘ architecture professional associations like the Brits‘ RIBA decided to provide some financial support or incentive for some open source projects that might go down the path of providing a decent alternative to AutoCAD and Revit (in the same way that Blender has for 3D Studio and the several other competitors).

I realize that coders don’t have much incentive to toil away on relatively huge tasks when they have no casual interest in the underlying tasks the software is used for. This is why I think that certain niche software categories need financially-motivated open source development.

No complaints here about Teams or Zoom or Google Meet (?) but I do always wonder who is listening in. We’re in a competitive tech industry and I keep thinking Americans could easily be listening in. They’re no different than the Chinese or Russians in that regard and could easily be taking our proprietary info. The French are right to find their own solutions.