Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

2 Kommentare
As someone with a civil engineering background, The roof holding a record amount of snow does not imply that it’s safe. Just because it didn’t collapse, doesn’t mean that an engineer is confident it is safe.
As a taxpayer in Ontario, I would be surprised to find out this *isn’t* one of Doug Ford’s corrupt shenanigans.
The full engineering reports should be made public, but there is at least one high level summary available: [https://www.infrastructureontario.ca/49ee2b/contentassets/84df22e71b7c40b2aaeef94da88c78b5/osc-building-a-to-c-raac-roof-panel-assessment-final-june-18-2024-r2.pdf](https://www.infrastructureontario.ca/49ee2b/contentassets/84df22e71b7c40b2aaeef94da88c78b5/osc-building-a-to-c-raac-roof-panel-assessment-final-june-18-2024-r2.pdf)
My reading of this (as the wrong kind of engineer) is that it doesn’t clearly state whether the reduced factor of safety is thought to be stable or will continue to degrade. But the report does give a sunset date (Oct. 2024) beyond which they consider the roof unsafe, which implies continued degradation. That is, it could withstand a load today and fail under the same load in the future.
Given the publicly available information, „it hasn’t collapsed yet so it’s safe“ looks like a bad argument.