David Coletto: Das Einzige, was Pierre Poilievre daran hindert, Premierminister zu werden, ist Pierre Poilievre
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/the-one-thing-standing-in-the-way-of-pierre-poilievre-becoming-prime-minister-pierre-poilievre/article_f3e3cc45-0f06-4fa3-9760-6c758b4214a5.html
7 Kommentare
I’d say Mark Carney also has a fair bit to do with it, especially after last week’s speech. Kind of tough to go back to being the big tough apple chomping Conservative tough guy act after Carney actually ripped to the biggest bully in the world to shreds. A little higher stakes than ripping up some bumbling reporter for asking a poorly phrased question. PP is looking very small these days.
Mehh I still think will see some floor crossers after he wins his reveiw .
Who actually thinks at this point Pierre will change .
If the Liberals already had another one or two crossers in line they’d most definitely best be suited to wait till Pierre secures his leadership agian before the pulled them .
I think Pierre has lost the buisness/investment community. To many people are now in line to benifet from the liberal current agenda. Carney has progressed to much for them to want to disrupt the direction only to bet on a combative, divisive , noisy bull dozer style politican to take over .
Isn’t it clear at this point that if the Conservatives wants to get back into power it’s not going to happen with PP?
Maybe a bit also the general incompetence of the rest of the Conservative Party. It tends to attract a certain kind of person who’s good at getting elected, but not much else.
I rather have Harper run again than Pierre. Harper is still the adult in the room and knows economics. Even recently the feds asked for Harper opinion on trade and economics, not Pierre.
This is a very good analysis, the Conservatives have broken the trust of centrist voters, and they are not coming back either, they either get a new leader, or they remain in opposition for years on end. They also have a huge issue with some of the people who were parachuted into that party.
> Seventy-one per cent support using language like “Canada is broken.” Fifty-four per cent want the party to be tougher and more confrontational with the media and institutions.
Unreal.
You have to think this comes to bubbles I guess? Like they think that running down the country and calling the media the enemy of the people is going to resonate with the rest of the voting population? With what’s going on in the world right now and after what we saw in the last election?
It has to be that that’s what their media bubble is telling them people actually want.
Or they’re just angry enough to want to see it happen, regardless of the impact on electoral chances? To own the libs as they say.