Close Menu
    Daten

    [OC] Koalitionsopfer in Afghanistan (2001–2021)

    View 32 Comments

    32 Kommentare

    2. Desiiiire on

      Afghani civilians weren’t considered as casualties? Or they really this low?

    6. Grantmitch1 on

      Surely it would make more sense to present this data as a proportion rather than absolute figures?

    8. TheRexRider on

      Americans should be super pissed about the idea of going to another pointless yet, but here we are.

    10. flexecute11235 on

      Let’s not forget the first four Canadians killed were on the front line, killed by Americans

    11. Lozsta on

      You forgot to count the ones killed by the US. I am pretty sure that a great number of the casualties for the top five there had ones where the US killed them.

    12. WheresWaldo85 on

      Kinda small considering Iran has killed more of its own citizens in the last month.

    14. originalusername8704 on

      Especially given it came about from US using Article 5 the very least is a per capita graph to really show the sacrifices made by allies in response to an attack on the US.

    17. richardxday on

      About a week late? All this blew up last week and the idiot was immediately proved to be wrong, again.

    18. Normal-Net-9491 on

      Why are people not talking about the civilians killed? “No the white people that died are more important”

    19. 68Interest on

      That 5.4 x the UK loses. Population of 63.4 million in UK, Population in USA 341.8 million. Good effort UK and Bless you all. RIP

    22. PotatoAppleFish on

      Great, now do per capita. That’s a better way to represent this particular data set.

    23. Smooth_Imagination on

      Adjusted for population the UK is about the same as US. Canada might be above both. 

    24. SalamanderNorth1430 on

      This is biased by the way the different parties of this coalition carried out their military objectives. My father was as a doctor for several times in Afghanistan. He worked together with US soldiers. He summarized it to me, that is GIs were at war while German soldiers thought to be working in a humanitarian mission.

    26. mcleanlt on

      So all in all, it’s less than a one week casualties for Russia on the front in Ukraine.

    27. Roquet_ on

      I support the agenda with this but it’s not exactly beautiful and % of population would be more meaningful here.

    28. AccessTheMainframe on

      These are *fatalities*, not casualties. Casualties include wounded and the number is far larger.

    29. LordDaedalus on

      It would be interesting to see this adjusted for total population size of each country, total military population, and total military spending to get a sense of comparable sacrafice for each scale of country on different metrics.

    30. ItsNoblesse on

      Now can we see the casualties of people who actually matter (Afghani civilians)

      I do not give a solitary fuck about the people who threw themselves into the fire for American geopolitical interests

    31. mariuszmie on

      Trump is right, especially about other nato nations special forces – they stayed back and only watch the action and no other nato soldier was hurt in America’s adventures as plainly the graphic demonstrates.

      Thank you for your attention in this matter

    Leave A Reply