Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

16 Kommentare
[removed]
One of the people interviewed seems to blame open source AI for this problem, while conveniently ignoring all the multimillion dollar sexual deepfake corporations that are operating lawfully.
Going after the companies who explicitly sell nonconsentual sexual deepfake services is the only logical move here. Targeting open source AI doesn’t solve the problem.
Aren’t women going to fight back and make fakes of the guys getting railed by tyson fury? Or a hippo? Or Elon getting it from xi jinping with trump doing 69? why are only women being subject to this abuse?
[removed]
[removed]
Not just women… Men too.
And furries…
and cars…
There are plenty more things that you don’t wish to see, ever.
[removed]
[removed]
Everything produced by AI – NEEDS to have an embedded water mark on it tracing it back to it’s source. Right in the middle so you cant miss it or crop it out.
This needs to he the number one rule across every platform.
I dont think this solves every problem. But it’s a start to defend victims and attempt to shame perpetrators.
**AI should not be filling creative gaps nor should it’s products or results be worth any value.**
Text is a different beast…
The „how does this affect anyone“ crowd came quick to the comments. This is why this technology will continue to exist and will have no consequences despite it including CP.
when you say „women are abused by things“ to get attention to your argument. like men are not subject to the same thing?
there are so many headlines and posts about this lately that im beginning to think its a marketing ploy to attract users
[removed]
Not sure of the age group here but there was a film made years ago named Brainstorm. It was Natalie Wood’s last film she made. The theme of the film was a technology where you could plug in the computer world through a receptacle installed in the back of the neck. You could plug the tech right into the brain. One day as a filler segment, a tech worker stole a recorder out of the lab and wore it on a date with his girlfriend. And he continued to wear it during his sexual pleasures with her through the night. Then he shared his encounter with her with other male friends. The film didn’t get into if the girlfriend knew about this. But if she did, and she was an integral part of the creative process, would the plug in product be legal and saleable?
Now what if the creative process was made with her input using artificial images of herself using AI? Are we looking at a simple disclosure statement?
I don’t understand how someone can be hurt by a fake image when there are very real threats like trafficking to worry about. Maybe focus your energy on something that actually matters.
the only legit defence here is offence. deepfake the fuck outta these dudes and the dudes who are in office but not progressing the issue