
Datenquelle: fifa.com + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_World_Cup_records_and_statistics
Verwendete Werkzeuge: datawrapper.de
Hinweis: Die Achsen sind gekürzt, um die Unterschiede zwischen den Top-Teams hervorzuheben.
Von worldcup-stats

Datenquelle: fifa.com + https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_World_Cup_records_and_statistics
Verwendete Werkzeuge: datawrapper.de
Hinweis: Die Achsen sind gekürzt, um die Unterschiede zwischen den Top-Teams hervorzuheben.
Von worldcup-stats
11 Kommentare
Finally some cool data that isn’t about people’s failed tinder matches
I’m not a Football/Soccer person but does this infer that France usually has better than average defense?
So we can conclude that the more goals you make, the more you win?
The Netherlands, one of the great to never win the WC.
Not beautiful!
You show a ratio (per game) on the y axis but cumulated goals on the the x axis; cumulated over all World Cup participations!
You are hiding that these nations played a vastly different number of games to shoot all those goals.
If you want to show any meaningful relation, *please* scale the goals by the number of games!
The dashed line in the middle doesn’t make any sense to me.
Also I don’t like that scales start from 15% / 30 goals. You barely save any space with such small offsets, but get all that visual distortion of shifted axes.
how many more world cups do we need to make up for those 100 goals we’re missing to reach Brazil and Germany? They got a huge head start back in the prehistoric days of football…
Looking this my mind went automatically to 7-1
Wow Korea being on that chart is hilarious, wouldn’t be surprised if it gets knocked off it during this tournament.
Actually I’m wondering if USSR, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia goals did not get inherited here.
That 7:1 brought us closer to Brazil
Germany is an outlier there probably due to the number of goals it scores against Brazil. Argentina is also one of „top“ scorers since it beat Perú by 6 to nil, in the 78 WC