Close Menu
    Politics

    Hotels sollten den 3. Verfassungszusatz umsetzen und sich weigern, ICE-Agenten unterzubringen

    View 44 Comments

    44 Kommentare

    1. casualfrog68 on

      Hotels in Minnesota in January? They are probably excited about the business. Like big corporations care about people or democracy?

    2. InsideAside885 on

      Good luck getting them to do that.

      Hilton corporate is pulling franchise licenses from any franchise property that refuses to house DHS employees.

    4. CouchCorrespondent on

      „Wait! What? You want us to miss out on money? We can’t possibly do something honorable if a buck is to be made! Ask someone else!“

    5. MiddleAgedSponger on

      They don’t respect the other amendments , why would they respect the third?

    7. BobInIdaho on

      Unfortunately, many of those hotels saw large income reductions in 2025 due to the lack of tourism caused by the current administration, and are desperate for any revenue streams currently replacing those missing dollars.

    8. RedditReader4031 on

      Hotel chains have government prices built in into their rate structures meaning they likely have contractural agreements with the federal government in the same way they do with AAA. In fact, the operator that cancelled those ICE reservations was a local Hilton franchisee who probably did so because extensive use by that agency was blocking out those business and travel customers who pay higher prices.

    9. hazlethings on

      It makes one wish for folks like Hiddleston’s character in The Night Manager – or anyone to pass along, or retain, info that could ID ICE-folk, even later on.

    13. Waste-Diamond-5875 on

      Pretty sure that wouldn’t work because they aren’t taking up residence w/o payment

    15. Notgreygoddess on

      For real impact, groups and businesses can announce they won’t book rooms or events at locations that house ICE. Your kid’s hockey, baseball, football teams. Union and company dinners, fundraisers etc.

    19. apiso on

      I hope I’m wrong, but I worry this will solve itself when someone out there decides to outright bomb or burn down a hotel full of ice agents. Be safe and smart everyone.

    20. verone3784 on

      Fuck just doing this in America, make them feel it globally.

      There are five Hilton owned hotels here in Iceland, several people including myself are already circulating lists of them and letting people know to avoid staying with them when they come to the country.

      If you ever visit, don’t stay here:

      * Hilton Reykjavík Nordica
      * Skald Hotel Akureyri – Curio Collection by Hilton
      * Rekjavík Konsulat Hotel – Curio Collection by Hilton
      * Iceland Parliament Hotel – Curio Collection by Hilton
      * Canopy by Hilton – Reykjavík City Center

      Fuck ‚em.

    21. Feeling_Reindeer2599 on

      This currently is not constitutional situation. It is financial/ PR choice. Were the Feds to criminalize Hotels refusal to house DHS this amendment would be relevant.

    22. Fragrant-Ambition853 on

      I’ve been done with Hilton hotels after they removed the property that refused service to ICE.

    23. TarquinusSuperbus000 on

      No. The hotels are willingly renting rooms for money. They aren’t being forced to house ICE/CBP, so the Third Amendment doesn’t apply. Don’t fall for the trap of thinking big business can be turned toward the social good.

    24. osumba2003 on

      The third amendment doesn’t even apply here, which is about quartering soldiers in private homes. A hotel is not a private home.

      However, as a private business, a hotel can legally deny service to anyone for any reason that is not otherwise protected. ICE is not a protected class.

    25. RellenD on

      The government isn’t forcing them to house ICE. They’re paying them and they’re greedily accepting it

    26. CableDawg78 on

      While the 3rd Amendment would be the way to go, hotel owners won’t do that and „get on the wrong side of the bed of trump“.
      Unless the general public that has rewards with certain chains and band together to affect their bottom line and occupancy.

    28. _WEND1G0_ on

      Well, I appreciate the sentiment, calling ICE soldiers, is arguably a more insulting equivalency than calling them cops

    29. tryingtoview on

      When I worked for Aimbridge, we were specifically instructed by corporate to never allow ICE or police any information of guests or employees to avoid raids, and to demand warrants for absolutely any police involvement on site that was not initiated by us.

    30. GaiaMoore on

      Since the 3rd Amendment so rarely comes up relative to the others, it’s fun listening to Constitutional scholars debate the precise meaning — that’s how little attention it gets in the modern world.

      [Here’s an old episode from 2020 of the National Security Law Podcast](https://www.nationalsecuritylawpodcast.com/episode-169-now-were-a-third-amendment-podcast/) where Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney discuss this. It was a brief issue when the National Guard was deployed during the George Floyd protests.

      At the time, Vladeck joked that it would be the only time they’d ever have a substantive conversation about the 3rd amendment thanks to Trump. Here’s to round two lol

    31. thenasch on

      „ICE is formally a civilian — not military — agency with a law enforcement component tasked with enforcing immigration laws. In reality, it operates as a paramilitary force. “

      Good luck making that argument in court.

    32. dontchewspagetti on

      Never did i imagine a day when people would knoe what the fucking ugly step brother of a law the 3rd amendment was… but by god. This would be AMAZING to try. There’s like NO precedent for this shit

    33. brihere on

      It is fascinating how fast principles and ethics go out the window when it comes to money. That’s what America is all about.

    34. Repulsive-Royal-5952 on

      If ice facilities they are good enough for immigrants they are good enough for ice agents.

    35. letsseeitmore on

      They’re too chicken shit to take a stand even though a lot of their workers are the ones that ICE is after.

    37. EuphoricCrashOut on

      What’s eve better? The public, at large, boycotting any Hotel/Restaurant/Business that supports ICE in -ANY- manner.

      We should start a website for this too… and list them all, like Ford to start with.

    38. dpdxguy on

      We saw what happened when a hotel tried that.

      It’s no longer „One nation under God.“ It’s one nation under corporations.

    39. interwebztourist on

      They won’t do anything the stockholders don’t like. Stockholders like fed money.

    40. A-town on

      You know why they won’t?

      Money.

      They would have to be beholden to something other than money for ethics and morals to come into play here.

    41. Fjr130 on

      They are doing that to prevent ice taking 2/3 of their employees 100% they have been threatened

    42. Sublimotion on

      Trump is about to prop up a shipping container and gold spray paint the words „Trump Taj Mahal“ in some vacant lot in Minneapolis and charge the ICE agents $300/night stay.

    43. LukeKornet on

      Why do people online think billionaires, millionaires, and large corporations share their sensibilities? Why would they do that when they LOVE hosting them, charging extra for the headache, and having guaranteed customers with government credit cards.

    Leave A Reply