Starmer wirft Trump vor, die Opferbereitschaft der Nato-Truppen in Afghanistan zu verringern | Donald Trump | Der Wächter

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/23/donald-trump-outrage-nato-troops-avoided-afghanistan-frontline

16 Kommentare

  1. Deicide1031 on

    It’s gotta be tiring to have to wake up everyday worried about what some moron across the Atlantic is going to say or do. He just doesn’t stop, it’s like he’s on meth or something.

    I don’t even like Starmer but I’m starting to feel bad for the guy.

  2. accuses?

    He fucking straight said it and it was a complete and utter bullshit lie.

    There are entire documentary/series on what that conflict was like for NATO allies fighting alongside the US.

    https://youtu.be/zJ0bchTPsto?si=kyN1F51tOsIzxgxb&t=650 (for any vets, this contains a fire fight in Afghanistan so be aware)

    Looks like they are away from the front line doesn’t it.

  3. ReindeerOwn3148 on

    At this point, I’m not even sure Trump knows what he’s saying. I think he may be experiencing rapid cognitive decline.

  4. no_va_det_mye on

    It appears very few, if any, of the western leaders have any idea how to deal with malignant narcissists.

  5. Particular-Song2587 on

    „Accuses“ is not the right term. Its CALLING OUT. To accuses implies theres a benefit of a doubt that Trump didn’t just pull another straight out lie.

  6. Trump questions whether NATO will come to the aid of the US, and then subsequently ensures that if the US ever invokes article 5 all the other nations will rightfully sit on their hands lets there be huge civil unrest.

    Its difficult to tell whether he is so self centred he doesn’t see the damage of that comment, or whether he is intentionally diminishing the value of NATO to the US so that they have no reason to stay.

    Either way, I have absolute confidence that if tomorrow, something happened that required a NATO member to invoke article 5, the USA either wont do anything, or the cost will be so high that their involvement would be just as costly as not having them there at all.

    A nation of absolute rotters. 77 million people voted for that turd, and over 40% of Americans still think he’s doing a great job.

  7. IndividualSkill3432 on

    The worst thing is we are tightly bound by using US made SLBMs and we are in a deal that is vital to Australias national security as in AUKUS and over and above that we have to play nice to keep weapons going to Ukraine, even if they are only trickling through.

    Some of this is on the UKs head, we have had little GDP per capita growth for 18 years and have cut defence to the bone. But there are very serious issues linked to the US and not just for our own defence.

    We are also one of the only two nuclear deterrents in Europe and while we may not be in direct danger of realistic threats, other countries in Europe are.

    We have to learn our lesson and never treat the US as anything other than a country we are sometimes aligned with, no longer allied too.

  8. Jebediah_Johnson on

    I would like to credit Trump for his petty bullshit leading me to learn that France actually did help the US by sending troops to Afghanistan.

  9. Dafffy_Duck on

    Trump does this to US troops too. During his first term, he visited a WW1 cemetery in France that had lots of US soldiers buried there. He called them „losers and suckers“ for dying in battle.

  10. Why does the title use Nato instead of NATO? Is it just lousy spell check, or is there a movement to change it into a word?

  11. Cut America off. Kick them off our military bases until the demented orange painted shitgibbon troll can behave, or stops being President.

  12. Pretty much every British politician has come out and condemned this, including strongly-worded statements (not this one) from government ministers.

    But not Nigel Farage. Silence so far. How strange.

Leave A Reply