„Max‘ Tod muss etwas bedeuten“: Die Eltern eines 7-jährigen Schülers aus Hamilton, der bei einem HSR-Busunglück ums Leben kam, sagen, sein Tod hätte verhindert werden können, wenn er zur Schule gegangen wäre

>School staff didn’t say specifically why they could no longer provide full-day care for Max, who needed help with “pretty much everything,” including eating, toileting and getting dressed to go outside, Chris said in an interview.

At some point this is no longer about accessing education; it’s about accessing long term, full time personal care.

>Details of the collision, which occurred at the corner of [Wilson and Emerald streets](https://archive.is/o/Ogqk4/https://maps.app.goo.gl/cVzTuHm3zxD1EcYbA) near J.C. Beemer Park, remain limited.

>Max was killed “after slipping and being run over by a city bus,” Chris told reporters on Wednesday.

Since he was not in the care of the school at the time this would indicate that the responsibility for his care was under his parent or guardian’s responsibility.

To be clear, I don’t think anyone deserves *shame* or *punishment* for this; but what I am reading is that *Max required complicated care from one or more individuals who could provide him with their complete and total undivided attention*.

Again, at some point we shouldn’t consider this a problem for the school system to solve. Max needed more support than can be reasonably expected of the school district.