28 Kommentare

  1. To be clear; the Zulu forces, while mostly armed with traditional weapons like spears and shields did have _some_ firearms and outnumbered the British 10 to 1

  2. Toastaexperience on

    Literally at the same time 20km away, less than 160 British regular, colonial troops and civilians would hold of 3000-4000 Zulu warriors for 10 hours. The Zulu warriors retreats and the British and their allies suffered 17 dead 15 wounded.

    11 Victoria Crosses were awarded for that action.

    I have had the fortune of visiting both sites when I lived in South Africa.

    The movie Zulu is quite a good film about that battle.

  3. nepali_fanboy on

    The Zulus did have modern weapons, especially their elite royal units. Furthermore, they outnumbered the British, who didnt know the terrain were outnumbered overwhelmingly, their total numbers constituting only 7.3% of the Zulu Army. The solar eclipse also blinded the British which was taken advantage off by the Zulus to their credit. Regardless, 1300 British troops would die in the battle. 3000 Zulu troops were killed as well. It was a very pyrhic victory if at all. The British would return in force and crush the Zulus at Ulundi, Gingindlovu, and also crushed the Zulus at Kambula despite being outnumbered 10:1, with the zulu army at Kambula under Mnyamana kaNgqengelele arguably being a near peer in firearms, only lacking field guns. Isandlwana was memorialized by the British themselves to show that the Zulus were a ’noble‘ people and kingdom. Its actual military value was utterly nil in the grand strategy of the Anglo-Zulu War.

  4. UnderstandingFresh84 on

    Couldn’t help but hear „who do you think you are kidding Mr Hitler…“ seeing this video start

  5. ok but if there were 3500 grown men vs 22000 10 year olds i would frankly have my money on the 10 year olds. (ignoring the fear factor of course, assuming a 10 year old would keep fighting seeing it’s fellow boy snapped in half)

  6. thehistorynovice on

    Zulus were and are not indigenous to South Africa, to be clear. Their kingdom itself was an imperialist, expansionist one and not native to the area.

    Maybe a better description would be that this is an example of an Iron Age style society being able to defeat a modern force in an isolated engagement – although granted the Zulus outnumbered the British forces more than 10-to-1 and had picked up weapons and tactics from earlier encounters with Europeans. And immediately (literally later that same day) after a Zulu force of 4000 warriors was defeated by a ragtag British force at Rorkes Drift which was outnumbered over 20-to-1.

  7. KarmaDispensary on

    And South Africa lived happily ever after. No need to research any further.

  8. Imperium_Dragon on

    It’s interesting that Isandlwana and Roarke’s Drift are just two completely opposite battles that happened in the same war.

Leave A Reply