Close Menu
    Politics

    ICE sagt, dass seine Beamten während Einwanderungsoperationen ohne richterlichen Beschluss gewaltsam in Häuser eindringen können: Memo von 2025


    ICE sagt, dass seine Beamten während Einwanderungsoperationen ohne richterlichen Beschluss gewaltsam in Häuser eindringen können: Memo von 2025

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ice-policy-officers-enter-homes-immigration-without-judicial-warrant-rcna255305

    View 46 Comments

    46 Kommentare

    1. brain_overclocked on

      Alt Headline: *ICE decides US Constitution doesn’t exist*

      –

      The average person has the power to inform their neighbors and local communities of their rights. Consider being one of them. Look out for each other.

      EDIT: [The Feds Keep Prosecuting Protesters Against ICE — and Losing | The Trump administration is on a losing streak against some of its loudest critics, as federal cases targeting opponents of aggressive immigration enforcement fall apart in courts nationwide.](https://theintercept.com/2025/12/31/trump-ice-protests-tow-truck-los-angeles/)

      >In the span of a week, prosecutors failed to bring convictions in two high-profile cases in Los Angeles federal court. In the first, a jury acquitted Bobby Nuñez, a tow-truck driver who hooked an ICE vehicle and was charged with stealing government property. In the second, a judge dismissed the case against Carlitos Ricardo Parias, a TikToker who was facing assault and property damage charges after a confrontation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, due to concerns that officials had violated his civil rights. (In the October 21 confrontation, an ICE agent shot him.)

      >“These arrests are a form of retaliation by the government,” said Matthew Borden, an attorney representing protesters, journalists, and legal observers in a lawsuit against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stemming from protests in Southern California over the past year. “When you have a real judge and a real jury looking at the evidence, it just falls apart.”
      …
      In higher-profile confrontations between protesters and federal agents amid aggressive immigration enforcement actions in blue cities like Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington D.C., federal officials have called defendants like Parias and Martinez “domestic terrorists” while seeking lesser charges.

      >Time and again, their cases have fallen apart.
      …
      Overall numbers for federal arrests of anti-ICE protesters were not immediately available, but the number of high-profile dismissals and acquittals of protesters in recent weeks stands in stark contrast to the usual win rate.

    2. fps916 on

      ICE says it is not bound by the constitution.

      It’s impossible to constrain the gestapo

    3. B-Z_B-S on

      Not legal. ICE isn’t allowed to do that. They are breaking the law if they do.

    4. Greis73 on

      Just a question of time before these clowns kick the wrong door in and this kettle boils over

    8. squintytoast on

      bet these fuckers dont try it in states with Stand Your Ground laws.

      Minnisota not being one of them…

      also,

      >It says that ICE agents are allowed to forcibly enter the home of a person using an administrative warrant if a judge has issued a “final order of removal.” Administrative warrants permit officers and agents to make arrests and are different from judicial warrants, which a judge or magistrate signs allowing entry into a home.

      they still need a *TYPE* of signed warrant, just not the ones we are used too.

    9. jason082 on

      Two years ago, these same people pushing this new policy would have said that this is why the second amendment exists.

    11. judunno5 on

      Can’t wait for SCOTUS’s originalist interpretation of how the fourth amendment can interpreted to allow this.

    13. iMaGiNe_697 on

      The only message to take away here is that these thugs will not treat you according to our laws. They will break down your door without due process.

      In turn, this means they WILL NOT FOLLOW THE LAW. They will arrest you without due process; they will hold you without any hearing; they will sentence you to hard labor without due process; they will torture you without due process; they will deport you without due process; they will fucking kill you without due process.

      We all have the duty to take action and defend our rights when the door gets broken down without due process.

      “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn’t love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

      Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

    16. eskimospy212 on

      So to round it up what they are saying is that masked, anonymous agents of the government can break down your door and take you away based on nothing more than their own determination that you did something wrong.

      Sure is strange how those conservatives who spent years complaining about fake government tyranny have so little to say when it comes to real government tyranny. 

      Conservatives and libertarians – this is exactly the thing you said you needed guns to fight against. Any update on when that starts?

    17. Cameherejust4this on

      We’re going to see bullets forcibly entering ICE officers if they start indiscriminately breaking into people’s homes.

    18. Fluffle-Potato on

      From the article:

      >The internal ICE memo says ICE agents are allowed to forcibly enter a person’s home using an administrative warrant if final orders of removal have been issued by immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals, or U.S. district or magistrate judges.

      >Although the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of General Counsel has recently determined that the U.S. Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose.

      >The DHS stated that immigrants in the country illegally who are served administrative deportation warrants (also known as Form I-205’s) have had full due process and a final order of removal from an immigration judge. In addition, the officers issuing these administrative warrants also have found probable cause. For decades, the Supreme Court and Congress have recognized the propriety of administrative warrants in cases of immigration enforcement.

      >The ICE memo serves to remind personnel of the restrictions of Form I-205. The memo states that Form I-205 is not a search warrant and that it “should only be used to enter the residence of the subject alien to conduct an immigration arrest.” It also says that officers and agents must give the people inside time to comply with the order, and they generally should not enter a residence before 6 a.m. or after 10 p.m., and that they „should only use a necessary and reasonable amount of force” to enter a home.

      >ICE officers have arrested roughly 220,000 people in the nine months from Jan. 20, when Trump returned to office, to Oct. 15. Around 145,000 of them have been people with criminal records, according to figures shared by the University of California, Berkeley.

    19. Skirtsteakforlife on

      If they catch you, you’ll be deported to El Salvador before you even have a chance to argue they illegally entered your home.

    20. PracticalChipmunk789 on

      The Supreme Court has already ruled that the Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, stating that the right to security in one’s „persons, houses, papers, and effects“ shall not be violated, and requires warrants to be based on probable cause.

      There is no presidential or other order that overrides the Supreme Court or The Constitution.

    27. CautiousHashtag on

      Imagine if Biden or Obama had their own Gestapo that shit on the Constitution and killed US citizens.

    28. subgamer90 on

      Uh, no they can’t. Memos aren’t laws. And any law that said they could would be blatantly unconstitutional anyway

    29. Western-Corner-431 on

      No they can’t. They can’t make illegal actions official policy. Castle doctrine

    30. plumberfun on

      Republicans are truly working hard to end the constitution as law. Judge Roberts must be so proud to be the Supreme court Justice who will forever be in the world history books as being responsible for the end of USA as a constitutional Republic.

    31. swearingino on

      That’s risky on their part. Did they forget they’re in America where over 40% of homes have firearms?

    32. Karma_Doesnt_Matter on

      I live in a stand your ground state and believe in the 2nd amendment. Come at me fascists.

    33. Big-Industry4237 on

      Yes they also say it’s illegal to film them and drive behind them on public roads. You can say whatever but a judge will never rule in favor of this . Completely unconstitutional

    39. Open_Mortgage_4645 on

      ICE policy doesn’t supercede the Constitution. They can proclaim themselves exempt from the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, but it doesn’t make it so.

    40. Th3FinalStarman on

      Thank You, NBC for publishing the stupidest fucking sanewashed headline I’ll read today. How about just saying „2025 ICE Memo Violates Constitutional Protections“, is that so hard?

    Leave A Reply