Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

11 Kommentare
And stricter background checks and all staff should be supervised.
„Protect the kids“, cameras in **every** place.
I notice there’s no comment on who would be monitoring the cameras, so it’s not like they’d actually be any good at pro-active prevention, only in investigating after the damage is already done.
But it would get the next generation used to be being surveilled every where, their whole life at least.
And let’s not get into reasonable expectations of privacy – or people simply hacking the cameras (which likely won’t be secured particularly well), to get their jollies off watching kids all the time.
Because people monitoring the cameras couldn’t *also* be the same….
Better vetting > more surveillance.
Or just not contract everything out to blood sucking scum who pay peanuts and get paedos while fucking off with the profits to Dubai
I have a camera which costs £30, records 24/7 for 60 days before overwriting, and is offline.
I would support one of these in every classroom. Not centrally managed. No ££££ contract for support. Nobody able to view footage remotely. Only for use in cases of allegations of wrongdoing.
Some cameras allow a password to be added to encrypt the video, and the password could be held by the governors and only released for specific investigations so staff members can’t snoop etc.
I used to work in a school in Hong Kong that taught young learners and we had CCTV in the classrooms
As a teacher I didn’t mind it too much, as I was told they’re their to protect you from false accusations.
In my case the cameras were monitored on site by the reception desk. We had two local admins who could see on the screen the live feed from our classroom.
Amazing they support this, but not mandatory CCTV in mini cabs.
Only if it’s private CCTV within the nurseries! No outside sources!
This is a terrible idea. Where would the cameras go? Would they be filming babies having their nappies changed? Toddlers on the toilet? Because that seems to me to be the kind of place that abuse is most likely to happen. What happens if the cctv films explicit images of my child in these situations? What guarantees do I have that those images don’t fall into the wrong hands?
What about childminders who look after children in their own homes? Are they supposed to consent to a cctv camera in their bathroom and living room?
How many cameras are needed to make sure there are no blind spots? What happens if the setting wants to take the children on a trip? Do we want staff to wear body cams?
I think it should be in all places where kids are involved.
Why tf is Labour so ridiculously obsessed with mass surveillance?
I’d give it 6 months until Labour MP’s are mandating that cameras be installed in every room of every house so they can „protect“ the woman and girls!