Um zu gewinnen, sollten die Demokraten ihre Führung aufgeben

https://www.salon.com/2026/01/20/to-win-democrats-should-chuck-their-leadership/

45 Kommentare

  1. A bit from the commentary:

    > The Democratic establishment shuns the progressive populism that’s vital to effectively countering bogus right-wing populism. And so the struggle to defeat the fascistic GOP and the fight to overcome the power of corporate Democrats are largely the same battle.
    >
    > Advocates for progressive change will remain on the defensive as long as the Trump party is in power. With the entire future at stake, social movements on the left should focus on organizing to oust Republicans from control of Congress in the midterms.
    >
    > **The point isn’t that Democrats deserve to win — it’s that people certainly don’t deserve to live under Republican rule**, and ending it is the first electoral step toward a federal government that serves the broad public instead of powerfully destructive and violent elites. Like it or not, in almost every case the only candidates in a position to defeat Republicans for the House and Senate this year will have a “D” after their name.

  2. Quitcha_Bitchin on

    DNC is fucked.

    I swear to god I’m surprised the center-left hasn’t moved on to independent. It’s fairly certain that the party leaders are not interested in making real change.

  3. Sweet_Concept2211 on

    Democrats have been sweeping elections across the country over the past year.

    Just saying.

  4. Orwells_Roses on

    New leadership would be a breath of fresh air. We need people who will take the fight to the fascists and who aren’t bought and paid for by billionaire interests.

  5. cranberryalarmclock on

    Why the fuck are people unable to see that our insistence on fighting against our own party is the reason we lost 2024? Leadership or not, perfect is the enemy of the good…

    The supreme Court is more important than your current obsession with Gaza. 

  6. I’d ask why it hasn’t already happened if it wasn’t clear they’re not that interested.

  7. thegoddamnbatman40 on

    Literally we need a total wipe out of established dems who are beholden to the donor class.

  8. They should. Way too much old boys back room bull shit. Acting as if it’s a game and they have to follow rules the other guys aren’t. Schumer and his cronies gotta be removed

  9. Sounds familiar, this by the same people who said to win we needed to chuck Biden?

  10. 0nlyhalfjewish on

    It’s shameful. They need to be primaried or removed so we can actually have representatives who do something.

  11. Glass-Amount-9170 on

    I’m Gen X and a center left independent who only started voting in 2020 for Biden and then Harris. Both seemed mediocre at the time but the orange shitgibbon is pure evil. I’m now all for a pretty big swing to the left,it’s the only way forward. As somebody who is self employed the ACA was the final straw. All the European countries enjoy a much higher standard of living and I’m not interested in going back to the 50’s here. Billionaires like musk controlling politics and donating 10 million for a fucking senate campaign have to go! Progressive equals progress and it’s time.

  12. Ok-Weather-7332 on

    It’s been a decade since they directly defied the will of the constituents. Their fucking hubris is as responsible for the state of America as Trump is.

  13. alabasterskim on

    100%. Jeffries is ass, honestly feels worse than Pelosi. Not even gonna talk about Schumer. Not sure what NY did to earn both chambers‘ leader posts but it’s time to end it.

  14. RoamingDrunk on

    They shouldn’t replace the leadership to win; they should replace them because they are an ineffective, out of touch relic of the past. Every time I hear them talk I wonder what world they live in.

  15. i_am_a_real_boy__ on

    The leadership is in place because it represents a majority of federally elected Democrats. If you want change, it starts in the primaries.

  16. The DNC has been totally fucked since 2016 but all the progressives were told to shut up and vote for a corporate centrist. And then again. And then again. And after losing two out of three and our democracy, NOW we need to look for new leadership. Too little way too fucking late.

  17. I agree wholeheartedly. Clear them out and get some fresh meat to work for us

  18. Embarrassed-Gap4148 on

    The fact that Democrats have to do anything to win is mind blowing to me

  19. elementality883 on

    „leadership“….haven’t seen anything that shows an inkling amount of that

  20. Chuck Schumer is frankly as expected but Hakeem Jefferies has been a disaster. From not being able to fully unite the party to refusing to endorse Zohran who is running for mayor of his own city.

    Too many House Dems are freestyling because he’s such a bad leader. Pelosi was a true leader and knew how to keep everyone united, and this dude is going waste precious years we don’t have the ability to waste.

    Harry Reid kept Joe Lieberman, Dems from Arkansas/Both Dakotas/Louisiana and other red states. While Schumer is getting rolled over by Sinema.

  21. hyperbole_is_great on

    People who only vote when they love the candidate aren’t the base. A base votes every time no matter what. So the first thing the Dems need to do is identify their actual base and then work to address their issues.

  22. Squeakyduckquack on

    No matter who it is, they will be a patsy for the party and assume all the heat that Schumer and Jeffries are currently getting. If AOC is selected, for example, that could effect her popularity come 2028 elections. It’s not as straightforward as putting your strongest soldier there to be a bulldog who never stops fighting. They are also a lightning rod for the party, for better or worse.

  23. I agree we need a more progressive leadership in the party, but I also remember 2024 when grievances convinced swaths of the Democratic party to stay home and not vote, leading to a Republican house majority and a Demented Don presidency. The eye on the prize is to return the country to normalcy.

  24. Evan_802Vines on

    More often than not, Senior Leadership exists for the perpetuation of Senior Leadership. It is seen then that if Senior Leadership is doing well then the organization as a whole is doing well.

  25. Dem leadership is the second most obvious case of the Emperor’s New Clothes in American politics today.

  26. I went to a local democratic meetup and everyone is calm and sipping wine talking about their upcoming election. No outrage, no urgency, no plan. Just same old party politics. No wonder they can’t win this state.

  27. The feckless corporate democrats will fumble this if they continue the same strategies that got us into this mess

  28. Several-Swordfish591 on

    It wasn’t a mistake, it was a coup…it’s just technology has surpassed a lot of the people’s understanding. They need an uneducated population. There is zero chance drump won the election, all of this was coming no matter what. J6 proved that

  29. georgiafan14 on

    They should keep electing more foreigners so we can watch them use the Quran to be sworn in, that’ll totally unite us

  30. thePsychonautDad on

    Chuck Schumer doesn’t for for the people who elect him.

    He works for AIPAC above all else. He fold to Trump & the Conservatives.

    Terrible leader.

  31. 100%. When push comes to shove, they’ve proven time and time again that they will not do what is needed to secure democracy.

Leave A Reply