Ernsthafte Frage:
Von den 70er bis Anfang der 2000er Jahre hatte fast jeder einen gefliesten Tisch.
Und dann… verschwanden sie im Grunde.
Was irgendwie seltsam ist, denn objektiv gesehen hatten sie einiges zu bieten:
– hitzebeständig (heiße Töpfe, kein Problem)
– wasserfest
– leicht zu reinigen
– im Grunde unzerstörbar
Ja, viele davon waren hässlich. Sehr hässlich.
Irgendwann verschob sich der Geschmack deutlich hin zu leichteren, „natürlicheren“ Möbeln, auch wenn diese im Alltag oft weniger praktisch und langlebig waren.
Da die Ästhetik der 90er- und frühen 2000er-Jahre langsam zurückkommt, Nachhaltigkeit immer wichtiger wird und die Menschen wieder einen Tisch zum Arbeiten, Essen und für das tägliche Leben nutzen, könnte eine moderne, neu gestaltete Version des gekachelten Tisches heute tatsächlich Sinn machen.
Schlankere Proportionen, klareres Design.
Die eigentliche Frage also:
Würden Sie heute einen modernen „Kacheltisch 2.0“ in Ihr Wohn- oder Esszimmer stellen? Warum oder warum nicht?
https://i.redd.it/rgn35r359deg1.jpeg
Von Famous_Namous1
9 Kommentare
Why not? Because I’m german and me and my friends think in drawers. And Fliesentischbesitzer are in drawers where you don’t want to be.
Ugly as sin. Please don’t. – sincerely a japanese.
Already happened. Loads of Zoomers and Alpha people ironically have one. Just go to a local second hand shop and wait for a 16-19 y.o. to go by and ironically appreciate it.
Plus the stuff in your images is already available. It’s more Scandi then German, but potato, tomato.
I actually like them a lot because they’re so robust.
Very good points.
I want to add: Tile material is heavy and textured with repeating straight-line cavities. In today’s furniture, coffee tables are lightweight and dining tables are flat-surfaced. Of course not all of them are like how I described, but people mostly prefer them that way.
I think the mutual ground would be to cover the top surface with a durable, easily cleaned material that is also lightweight and aesthetically matches the frame. On the other hand, a single piece of tile with a smooth surface finish that covers the entire table does not also sound bad. For something like that, I wouldn’t mind the extra weight and (reasonably) higher cost.
My parents have a kind of tiled table but not with ceramic tiles but stone in different shapes with a slightly rough surface and golden accents. The table itself is oak wood, I think.
It is not my favourite design, but I think it is not trashy. With a slimmer more modern design I think it could look nice in today’s living rooms.
„Easy to clean“? On your picture I see crevices around the tiles, crevices between the tiles, and a rough, porous surface with significant relief. Basically one big dirt trap.
Thanks, but I’ll stick with my smooth wooden table that I can wipe down in ten seconds flat.
Happy Hänno sounds
I don’t think I have ever in my life seen a tiled table.
I don’t hate the picture you attached, but I don’t think they were as ubiquitous as you believe they were.