can someone explain how the political system of Iran works? do their political party have different views and hold elections?
I am 100% ignorant on this. I always thought it is like a one party state like China
hdufort on
US and Iran finally sharing something 😅
anotheruser55 on
Just a couple of decades ago the world was covered with two party systems even in long consolidated democracies. I could have not guessed that now there just a couple of countries.
[deleted] on
[deleted]
Bella_Mia_ on
US is actually multi party
plsdontattackmeok on
Technically Malaysia is two party, is just component party too many
Zinch85 on
Just when Groenlandia has data in a map at last it is wrong 🤦
creeper321448 on
When over 90% of the seats in the House of Commons are either the Conservative or Liberal parties, Canada is not a „multi-party“ country.
Meanteenbirder on
I think another category is for two-candidate runoffs like in Poland and Brazil
dumpsterfire_yt on
Greenland literally has 5 parties, 4 of them having around 20% of the parliament, the coalition pay be made up of 90% of the seats but it still counts as multi-party.
carlosortegap on
shouldn’t Japan be dominant?
ZPTs on
The U.S. doesn’t *have* two be a two party system but the elites benefit from a two party system so that’s what we get by default.
lradoriath on
Blue is generous for Turkey. It has effectively been a dominant-party system since 2002, and at best Turkey is a two-party country posing as a multi-party democracy. Alliances are constantly shifting, but there is usually a left-wing party (CHP) with roughly a quarter of the vote that tries to align with smaller parties to challenge the right-wing bloc. The right wing, by contrast, consistently consolidates the religious and nationalist vote.
The main left-wing party has existed since the founding of the Republic. While the CHP has remained a major political force in Turkey, it has not held the top executive office for a sustained, uninterrupted period since 1950. Its participation in government has been only thanks to coalition arrangements since then.
Western_Customer3836 on
🔥One Party System!!!🔥 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
BigBing666 on
Calling Australia a Multi-Party system is a little much. For most of modern Australian history it’s been one party and one coalition (which split up last year, nobody knows how the next election will go) with some very minor parties/independents that only get a few seats and are almost never involved in forming government.
Sydorovich on
Ukraine is not yellow, map is dismissed as propaganda.
_JackSpears_ on
Russia, China and Iran = dictatorship
Due-Rent-965 on
I guess PRC and DPRK have multiple parties, but the communist party is dominant and has the final say. So, technically, dominant party.
mavs91 on
US should be red basically
Areat on
Madagascar is a junta as well since they recent russian backed putsh.
odrea on
difference between dominant part and multiparty?
kinky-proton on
Western sahara is two kinds of wrong.
1 its part of Morocco so multi party.
2 even if you want to go the other way it’d be a one party state where the president of SARD is by definition the chairman of the polisario front
Inevitable_Equal_729 on
Japan must be Yellow.
Sisyphus-in-denial on
Shouldn’t Nepal and Madagascar be transitional?
TrainingArtistic8505 on
Us should be red.
Mindless_Olive on
Can someone explain what ’non-partisan‘ means here?
LongjumpingElk4099 on
Despite Canada being multi-party only two parties have ever been in control
weirdwallace75 on
In those „multi-party“ countries, how many coalitions are there?
Because if parties can only win with a few of their friends, and there’s only two groups of friends, you’re back to a two-party system in all but name.
jimros on
If „dominant“ refers to the relationship between the party and the state, then it should include South Africa just as much as Hungary, Serbia, and Paraguay.
If it refers to the results of elections, then South Africa and Japan.
No idea where Greenland comes from, not true under any definition.
Hispanoamericano2000 on
Somewhat odd that the label „Hybrid Regime“ is absent from this type of map.
South_Telephone_1688 on
Many of these „multi-party“ are basically One Party, maybe Two Party at best. Some examples include Canada (Lib vs Con), South Korea (same 2 parties that keep changing names), and Japan (LDP).
If you’re only looking at technicalities, then China and a bunch of others are also a multi-party countries.
Pershing99 on
One and two party system sounds about the same….
Ok-Welcome-5369 on
Greenland is a multiparty state. Not a dominant state
Massive_Advantage477 on
Nepal has a transitional government at the moment
Titouf26 on
South Korea is only a multi party system on paper. It is in fact a 2-party country.
DrUnderstandable on
South Korea multi party is laughable
User-9640-2 on
>Pakistan – Multi party
It’s a Military dictatorship, masquerading as Multi party system lol
40 Kommentare
The PRC has 9 political parties.
can someone explain how the political system of Iran works? do their political party have different views and hold elections?
I am 100% ignorant on this. I always thought it is like a one party state like China
US and Iran finally sharing something 😅
Just a couple of decades ago the world was covered with two party systems even in long consolidated democracies. I could have not guessed that now there just a couple of countries.
[deleted]
US is actually multi party
Technically Malaysia is two party, is just component party too many
Just when Groenlandia has data in a map at last it is wrong 🤦
When over 90% of the seats in the House of Commons are either the Conservative or Liberal parties, Canada is not a „multi-party“ country.
I think another category is for two-candidate runoffs like in Poland and Brazil
Greenland literally has 5 parties, 4 of them having around 20% of the parliament, the coalition pay be made up of 90% of the seats but it still counts as multi-party.
shouldn’t Japan be dominant?
The U.S. doesn’t *have* two be a two party system but the elites benefit from a two party system so that’s what we get by default.
Blue is generous for Turkey. It has effectively been a dominant-party system since 2002, and at best Turkey is a two-party country posing as a multi-party democracy. Alliances are constantly shifting, but there is usually a left-wing party (CHP) with roughly a quarter of the vote that tries to align with smaller parties to challenge the right-wing bloc. The right wing, by contrast, consistently consolidates the religious and nationalist vote.
The main left-wing party has existed since the founding of the Republic. While the CHP has remained a major political force in Turkey, it has not held the top executive office for a sustained, uninterrupted period since 1950. Its participation in government has been only thanks to coalition arrangements since then.
🔥One Party System!!!🔥 🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳🇨🇳
Calling Australia a Multi-Party system is a little much. For most of modern Australian history it’s been one party and one coalition (which split up last year, nobody knows how the next election will go) with some very minor parties/independents that only get a few seats and are almost never involved in forming government.
Ukraine is not yellow, map is dismissed as propaganda.
Russia, China and Iran = dictatorship
I guess PRC and DPRK have multiple parties, but the communist party is dominant and has the final say. So, technically, dominant party.
US should be red basically
Madagascar is a junta as well since they recent russian backed putsh.
difference between dominant part and multiparty?
Western sahara is two kinds of wrong.
1 its part of Morocco so multi party.
2 even if you want to go the other way it’d be a one party state where the president of SARD is by definition the chairman of the polisario front
Japan must be Yellow.
Shouldn’t Nepal and Madagascar be transitional?
Us should be red.
Can someone explain what ’non-partisan‘ means here?
Despite Canada being multi-party only two parties have ever been in control
In those „multi-party“ countries, how many coalitions are there?
Because if parties can only win with a few of their friends, and there’s only two groups of friends, you’re back to a two-party system in all but name.
If „dominant“ refers to the relationship between the party and the state, then it should include South Africa just as much as Hungary, Serbia, and Paraguay.
If it refers to the results of elections, then South Africa and Japan.
No idea where Greenland comes from, not true under any definition.
Somewhat odd that the label „Hybrid Regime“ is absent from this type of map.
Many of these „multi-party“ are basically One Party, maybe Two Party at best. Some examples include Canada (Lib vs Con), South Korea (same 2 parties that keep changing names), and Japan (LDP).
If you’re only looking at technicalities, then China and a bunch of others are also a multi-party countries.
One and two party system sounds about the same….
Greenland is a multiparty state. Not a dominant state
Nepal has a transitional government at the moment
South Korea is only a multi party system on paper. It is in fact a 2-party country.
South Korea multi party is laughable
>Pakistan – Multi party
It’s a Military dictatorship, masquerading as Multi party system lol
China has some other parties
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_political_parties_in_China
Debatable.